1
$\begingroup$

Suppose $S\subseteq{\mathbb{R}}$ is nonempty. Show that $u$ is an upper bound of $S$ if and only if $t\in\mathbb{R}, u<t$ imply $t\notin S$

Here's my attempt.

$\Rightarrow$ Let $u$ be an upper bound of $S$. Thus, $s\le u, \forall s\in S$. Now suppose that $\exists t\in \mathbb{R}$ such that $u<t$. Therefore $$s\le u<t \rightarrow s<t$$

Thus, $t$ is strictly greater than $s \forall s\in S$, which implies $t\notin S$.

$\Leftarrow$ Let $t,u \in \mathbb{R}$ such that $u<t$. Assume that $u$ is a lower bound of S. By definition of lower bound, $u\le s, \forall s \in S$. Thus $$u<t\le s \text{ or } u\le s<t$$ Thus it is possible for $t$ to be an element of $S$. However, this is impossible as we stated $t\notin{S}$. Thus by contradiction, our assumption that $u$ is a lower bound must be wrong. Therefore, $u$ is an upper bound of $S$.

Therefore i have shown that $u$ is an upper bound of $S$ if and only if $t\in\mathbb{R}, u<t$ imply $t\notin S$

As I am working on my proof skills, I feel as though I have done my work properly. I feel as though, logically this is a good proof, but I was hoping to have it critiqued. If it is wrong, where are the holes in the argument?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Another idea is to rewrite $\forall s\in S\colon s\le u$ as $\forall s\in \mathbb R\colon(s\in S\to s\le u)$ and use contraposition $\forall s\in \mathbb R\colon(\neg(s\le u)\to \neg(s\in S))$, i.e. $\forall s\in \mathbb R\colon(s>u\to s\notin S)$ $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Feb 23 '14 at 15:13
1
$\begingroup$

Lower bounds have nothing to do with it, instead ...

If $u$ is an upper bound then there exists no $t$ in $S$ and $u < t$. Since for any $u\in \mathbb R$ there exists $t > u$ (lots of them in fact) it follows that such a $t$ is not in $S$.

Conversely for $t \in \mathbb R$ if $u < t$ implies that $t$ is not in $S$, then there is no $t$ in $S$ greater than $u$ so $u$ is an upper bound.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.