3
$\begingroup$

In Bott and Tu's book, "Differential forms in Algebraic Topology", page 45, Section 5 of Chapter one, he tried to prove the Poincare duality. But I find one step mysterious, namely when he describes the sequence $H_c^{n-q-1}(U\cup V) \rightarrow^{d_*} H_c^{n-q}(U\cap V) \rightarrow H_c^{n-q}(U) \oplus H_c^{n-q}(V)$, and if $\tau$ is in $H_c^{n-q-1}(U\cup V)$, then $d_* \tau$ can be such that

(-(extension by 0 of $d_* \tau$ to $U$), (extension by 0 of $d_* \tau$ to $V$)) = ($d(\rho_U\tau), d(\rho_V\tau))$

where $\rho_U$ and $\rho_V$ are partition of unity. I feel confused by this part, why this is true?

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

The result is given by diagram chasing.

The map $d_*$ is the connecting homomorphism, so by chasing it we shall do the following:

1.Find inverse image in $\Omega^*_c(U) \oplus \Omega^*_c(V)$.

2.differentiate it.

3.Find the inverse image in $\Omega^*_c(U \cap V)$

And you can check proof of Prop 2.7 on page 26 for the explicit maps in each step.

I should make it a comment but I do not have enough reputation. Sorry about that.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.