Let $X$ be a smooth projective curve of genus $g\geq2$ over an algebraically closed field $k$ and denote by $K$ a canonical divisor.

I have some clues about the geometrical interpretation of the Riemann-Roch Theorem for smooth algebraic curves, but also some doubts which I would like to clarify. Recall that the RR formula is $$ h^0(X,\,D)-h^0(X,\,K-D) = d-g+1\,. $$

Assume that $X$ is not hyperelliptic, so that the canonical map is actually a canonical embedding $$ \phi_K : X \to \mathbb{P}^{g-1} \qquad P\mapsto\{ \; s\in H^0(X,\,K) \mid s(P)=0 \; \} $$ giving a preferred realization of the curve inside a $(g-1)$-dimensional projective space.

The key feature of such an embedding is that there is a bijective correspondence between hyperplanes $W\subset \mathbb{P}^{g-1}$ and effective divisors in the linear system $ |K| \cong \mathbb{P}H^0(X,\,K) $.

The picture shows the canonical embedding in $\mathbb{P}^2$ of a non hyperelliptic curve of genus $3$.

The canonical embedding in the plane of a non hyperelliptic curve of genus 3

Let $D=\sum_{i=1}^d P_i$ be an effective divisor consisting of $d<g$ distinct points of $X$. We define $$ \phi_K(D) := \operatorname{span}\{\phi_K(P_1), \dots, \phi_K(P_d)\}. $$

The vector space $H^0(X,\,K-D)$ can be interpreted as the space of canonical divisors containing $D$, and here comes my first question:

(1) Is it correct to identify $\mathbb{P}H^0(X,\,K-D)$ with the set of hyperplanes of $\mathbb{P}^{g-1}$ passing through $\phi_K(D)$ ? If so, how can one see it formally?

Let $r(D) := \dim |D|$ denote the dimension of the complete linear series associated to $D$. Further, denote by $D'=K-D$ the residual divisor of degree $d'=2g-2-d$.

If (1) is correct, then it follows that $r(D)$ equals the number of hyperplanes of $\mathbb{P}^{g-1}$ passing through $\phi_K(D')$. Now, notice that the RR can be rewritten as

$$ r(D)=[g-1]-[d' - r(D')] $$

so that we deduce that $r(D')$ counts the number of independent linear relations on the points of $D'$ and we can give the following geometrical interpretation of the Riemann-Roch:

The integer $r(D)$ is the number of hyperplanes passing though $\phi_K(D')$, hence it equals the difference between the dimension $g-1$ of the ambient space and the dimension of the space spanned by the points of $\phi_K(D')$.

Of course my second question is:

(2) Do you agree with this geometrical interpretation?

  • $\begingroup$ Nice question. A side remark: your picture shows a plane quartic (hence of genus $3$, not $4$)! on such a curve a canonical divisor is exactly what you drew: $4$ points on a line. $\endgroup$ – Brenin Feb 20 '14 at 11:12
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, that was a bad typo! $\endgroup$ – Abramo Feb 20 '14 at 11:27
  • $\begingroup$ Btw, I agree with your interpretation. I do not know if this is precise enough, but a way to see it would be to just observe that $H^0(X,K-D)$ is the subspace of $H^0(X,K)$ consisting of sections vanishing along (the support of) $D$ according to the multiplicities of the (supporting) points in $D$. What you wrote is the projectivized ($\mathbb P$) version of this. $\endgroup$ – Brenin Feb 20 '14 at 12:31
  • 15
    $\begingroup$ What a beautiful, large, coloured picture: just like a picture in algebraic geometry should be ! +1 $\endgroup$ – Georges Elencwajg Feb 20 '14 at 22:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ In case you don't know where to find the flag responses: Questions older than 60 days cannot be migrated. You could however re-ask. After not getting an answer for a long enough time, that's legitimate. One year is more than long enough. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Mar 11 '15 at 23:53

The answer to your first question is yes. As for the second question I would make a minor adjustment but the idea is correct. Please be patient with me as I set things up first.


Let $\omega_C$ be the sheaf of holomorphic differential forms on $C$. For any vector space $V$ I will denote by $|V|$ the projective space of lines in $V$ and by $\mathbb{P}(V)$ the projective space of codimension 1 planes in $V$, henceforth referred to as hyperplanes.

Throughout I will let $V = H^0(C,\omega_C)$ stand for the global holomorphic differentials on $C$. For a divisor $D$ on $C$ let $V(-D) = H^0(C,\omega_C(-D))$ which is to be viewed as a subspace of $V$ using the natural injection $\omega_C(-D) \hookrightarrow \omega_C$.

Let me write the map $\varphi : C \to \mathbb{P}^{g-1}$ with the proper notation, because as things stand the notation suggests that generators for $V$ have been chosen. The preferred version, as you put it, can be written as $\varphi: C \to \mathbb{P}(V)$ where $$ p \mapsto V_p := \mathrm{ker}(V \to \omega_C \to \omega_C|_p). $$ It is clear that $V(-p) \subset V_p$ but Riemann-Roch says that the dimensions match so we get $V(-p) = V_p$.

Basic observations

Given $q \in \mathbb{P}(V)$ we get a hyperplane $H_q \subset |V|$ by duality. Here, $H_q$ parametrizes hyperplanes in $\mathbb{P}(V)$ containing $q$. Given two points $q_1, q_2$ the line between $q_1$ and $q_2$ can be viewed as the intersection of all hyperplanes containing $q_i$'s. This is the dual of $H_{q_1}\cap H_{q_2}$. And similarly for more points. So far this is linear algebra, let us apply it to our specific setting.

Our description of the map $\varphi$ ensures that $H_{\varphi(p)} = |V(-p)|$. Given $p_1, p_2 \in C$ the line between $\varphi(p_1)$ and $\varphi(p_2)$ has dual $|V(-p_1)|\cap|V(-p_2)|$ which is easily seen to be $|V(-p_1-p_2)|$ (Check!). And if $D$ is reduced, this argument is sufficient to conclude that $|V(-D)| \subset |V|$ parametrizes the hyperplanes through $\varphi(D)$.

It is possible, but difficult, to describe the locus of hyperplanes having high order contact at a point $p \in C$ using just geometry. So we go back to doing a little more tautology.

Advanced tautology

If you give me any divisor $D \in |\omega_C| = |V|$ then this gives a line in $H^0(C,\omega_C)$. Pick a section $\sigma$ generating this line. By the standard relations $D = (\sigma)_0$. Now this point $D$ has a dual hyperplane $W_D \subset \mathbb{P}(V)$ consisting of all hyperplanes in $|V|$ containing $D$. I claim that $W_D \cdot \varphi(C) = D$.

Indeed, $W_D$ corresponds to a divisor in the linear system of the tautological line bundle $\mathcal{O}(1)$ which by construction has global sections canonically isomorphic to $V$. Furthermore, the divisor $W_D$ corresponds precisely to the (line generated by) $\sigma \in V$. Now the intersection of $W_D$ with $C$ can be obtained by pulling back $(\mathcal{O}(1),\sigma)$ to $C$. However, the pullback of $\mathcal{O}(1)$ is of course (canonically isomorphic to) $\omega_C$ and the section $\sigma$ maps to $\sigma$ again by canonical identifications. This proves the desired statement.

Wrapping up

So far what we have been doing was largely exploratory. Now let's tackle your question head on. The inclusion $V(-D) \hookrightarrow V$ identifies sections of $\omega_C(-D)$ with sections of $\omega_C$ that vanish on $D$ (this follows from the exact sequence obtained from $\omega_C(-D) \hookrightarrow \omega_C$). Therefore if we take $\sigma \in V(-D)$ then the corresponding hyperplane $H \subset \mathbb{P}(V)$ satisfies $H \cdot C \ge D$. Conversely, any hyperplane that satisfies $H \cdot C \ge D$ corresponds to (the line generated by) a section of $\omega_C$ vanishing on $D$, hence to a section of $\omega_C(-D)$. This answers your first question.

As for the second question, if $d' = \mathrm{deg} D'$ and $d' < g$ then we expect $\varphi(D')$ to span a $d'-1$ dimensional projective subspace. Then your calculation shows that $r(D')$ in fact measures the failure of our expectation. More precisely, $r(D') = d'-1 - \mathrm{dim}(\mathrm{span}(\varphi(D')))$. The space of hyperplanes in $\mathbb{P}^{g-1}$ passing through a $k$-dimensional projective space has dimension $(g-2) - k.$ Then putting these together we get: $$ r(D) = (g-2) - (d'-1 - r(D')) = (g-1) - (d' - r(D')) $$


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.