Packing spheres on the boundary of a larger sphere Consider the following problem, which is a variation of the sphere packing problem and is somehow related to the kissing number problem. For a dimension $n\ge 2$ and a natural $k$, let $r=r(n,k)$ be the maximal radius of $k$ spheres (in $\mathbb{R}^n$) that can be packed into the boundary ring (is that the name of it?) of radius $2r$ of the unit sphere; that is, into the set of all points whose distance from 0 is in the interval $[1-2r, 1]$.
It is easier to explain this using examples:


*

*$r(2,1)$ is 1, as the maximal radius $r$ of a single sphere that should be embedded in the subset of the unit sphere containing all points whose distance from 0 lies in the interval $[1-2r,1]$ is simply 1 (in which case, the said subset is the unit sphere itself). In fact, $r(n,1)=1$ for any $n\ge 2$.

*$r(2,2)$ is 0.5, as one can pack 2 0.5-radius spheres inside the unit sphere. I guess $r(n,2)=0.5$ for any $n\ge 2$.

*$r(2,3)$ is ... well, I already don't know that.


What I do know (know might be too harsh here) is that:
$$\lim_{k->\infty}k\cdot r(2,k)=\pi$$
And that makes me guess $k\cdot r(2,k)$ is an increasing function, going from 1 to $\pi$. A more general limit can be described as follows: the limit of ratio of the sum of all surface areas of all packed spheres, and the surface area of the unit sphere. If we denote that ratio with $R(n,k)$, we obtain (I think)
$$\lim_{k\to\infty}R(2,k)=\pi$$
and
$$\lim_{k\to\infty}R(3,k)=\pi$$
but this is where it stops, as
$$\lim_{k\to\infty}R(4,k)=\frac{\pi^2}{4}$$
and I think that
$$\lim_{k\to\infty}R(9,k)=\frac{\pi^4}{840}$$
So my question actually consists of three sub-questions:


*

*Can you imagine how $r(n,k)$ (or $R(n,k)$) looks like? Is it monotone, does it always have a limit for $k\to\infty$, can you estimate that limit with respect to $n$, etc.

*I there any clear relation between $k\cdot r(n,k)$ and $R(n,k)$?

*Is $$\lim_{n,k\to\infty}R(n,k) = 0,$$ and if so, do you have any intuition about it?

 A: Let $\mathcal{R}_n = \lim\limits_{k\to\infty} R(n,k)$. Your numbers on $\mathcal{R}_n$ doesn't feel right for $n \ge 3$.
For any fixed $n$ and large $k$, the centers of the small spheres of radius $r$ should be constrained to a sphere of radius $1-r$. To the small spheres, the space between two spherical shell of radius $1$ and $1-2r$ will look flat. So the optimal $(r,k)$ configuration will correspond to some sort of close packing of $S^{n-2}$ in a $\mathbb{R}^{n-1}$. 
Let $\rho_{n}$ be the optimal packing density of $S^{n-1}$ in $\mathbb{R}^n$.
Let $\displaystyle\sigma_n = \frac{\pi^{n/2}}{\Gamma(\frac{n}{2}+1)}$ be the volume of the unit $n$-ball in $\mathbb{R}^n$. We know the "surface area' of the unit $n$-ball is given by $n\sigma_n$. This leads to
$$\begin{align}
& \sigma_{n-1} k\,r^{n-1} \approx n\sigma_n (1-r)^{n-1} \times \rho_{n-1}
\\
\implies & \mathcal{R}_n = \lim_{k\to\infty} k\,r^{n-1}(n,k) \approx n\frac{\sigma_n}{\sigma_{n-1}}\rho_{n-1} =
\frac{2\sqrt{\pi}\,\Gamma\left(\frac{n+1}{2}\right)}{\Gamma\left(\frac{n}{2}\right)}\rho_{n-1}
\end{align}$$
It is known that $\rho_1 = 1$, $\displaystyle \rho_2 = \frac{\pi}{2\sqrt{3}}$, $\displaystyle \rho_3 = \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{18}}\color{blue}{^{[1]}}$ and $\displaystyle \rho_8 \approx \frac{\pi^4}{384} ( 1 + O(10^{-14}) )\color{blue}{^{[2]}}$. This give us an estimate
$$\mathcal{R}_n \approx \begin{cases} 
\pi,&n  = 2\\
\\
\frac{2\pi}{\sqrt{3}},& n = 3\\
\\
\frac{\pi^2}{4\sqrt{2}}, & n = 4\\
\\
\frac{2\pi^4}{105},&n = 9
\end{cases}$$
Something very different from your guess when $n \ge 3$.
About what happens to $\mathcal{R}_n$ for large $n$, we know that
for $n \ge 115$, there is an upper bound for $\rho_n$ of the form$\color{blue}{^{[3]}}$:
$$\rho_n \le 2^{-(0.5990\ldots + o(1))n}$$
This means $\mathcal{R}_n$ converges to $0$ as $n$ tends to infinity.
Notes


*

*$\color{blue}{[1]}$ T.C. Hales, A proof of the Kepler conjecture, Ann. of Math. (2) 162 (2005), 1065-1185. MR2179728 doi:10.4007/annals.2005.162.1065.

*$\color{blue}{[2]}$ the packing density $\frac{\pi^4}{384}$ is achieved
by regular packing of spheres on an $E_8$ lattice in $\mathbb{R}^8$. The $O(10^{-14})$ error bound is given by H.Cohn and A. Kumar but I don't know the exact reference.

*$\color{blue}{[3]}$ G.A.Kabatyanskii and V.I.Levenshetin. Bounds for packings on a sphere and in space (Russian), Problemy Peredaci Informacii 14 (1978), 3-25; English translation in Problems of Information Transmission 14 (1978), 1-17, MR0514023.
