I am reading a computation that $\int_{0}^{\infty} \frac{1 - \cos x}{x^{2}}\, dx = \frac{\pi}{2}.$ They integrate over the indented semicircle. Let $R_{\varepsilon}$ be the semicircle in the upper half plane of radius epsilon around the origin going from $-\varepsilon$ to $\varepsilon$. My question is: what is the reasoning behind the following statement:

$$\int_{R_{\varepsilon}}\frac{1 - e^{iz}}{z^{2}}\, dz \rightarrow \int_{\pi}^{0}(-ii)\, d\theta = -\pi$$

as $\varepsilon \rightarrow 0$.


Since $z = -\epsilon \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi}$, where $\phi$ varies from $0$ to $\pi$. Then $\mathrm{d} z = i \epsilon \, \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} \mathrm{d} \phi$, so

$$ \int_{R_\epsilon} \frac{1 - \mathrm{e}^{i z}}{z^2} \mathrm{d} z = \int_0^\pi \frac{ 1-\exp( -i \epsilon \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} )}{ \epsilon^2 \mathrm{e}^{-2 i \phi}} (i \epsilon \, \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} ) \mathrm{d} \phi = \int_0^\pi \frac{ 1-\exp( -i \epsilon \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} )}{ \epsilon} (i \, \mathrm{e}^{i \phi} ) \mathrm{d} \phi $$ Now, as $\epsilon \to 0$, $\frac{ 1-\exp( -i \epsilon \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} )}{ \epsilon} \sim i \, \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} + o(\epsilon) $, thus $$ \int_0^\pi \frac{ 1-\exp( -i \epsilon \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} )}{ \epsilon} (i \, \mathrm{e}^{i \phi} ) \mathrm{d} \phi \to \int_0^\pi \left( i \, \mathrm{e}^{-i \phi} \right) ( i \, \mathrm{e}^{i \phi}) \mathrm{d} \phi = \int_0^\pi (i)^2 \mathrm{d} \phi = -\pi $$


Consider the Laurent series $$ \frac{1-e^{iz}}{z^2}=-\frac{i}{z}+\frac{1}{2}+\frac{iz}{6}-\frac{z^2}{24}-\dots $$ The only part that doesn't vanish as $\epsilon\to0$ is $-\frac{i}{z}$. The integral of $\frac{1}{z}$ is $\log(z)=\log|z|+i\arg(z)$. Since $\arg(z)$ drops by $\pi$ over $R_\epsilon$ (and $|z|$ doesn't change), we get that the integral is $(-i)(-i\pi)=-\pi$. In the statement you cite, it looks as if they have converted the integral of $-\frac{i}{z}$ to polar coordinates: $$ \begin{align} \int_{R_\epsilon}-\frac{i}{z}\;\mathrm{d}z &=\int_\pi^0\frac{-i}{r}e^{-i\theta}\;\mathrm{d}re^{i\theta}\\ &=\int_\pi^0-ie^{-i\theta}ie^{i\theta}\;\mathrm{d}\theta\\ &=\int_\pi^0-ii\;\mathrm{d}\theta\\ \end{align} $$

  • $\begingroup$ Why does the constant $\frac{1}{2}$ vanish as $\epsilon \rightarrow 0$? $\endgroup$ – jwalk May 16 '15 at 20:08
  • $\begingroup$ Because the length of the contour is $2\pi\epsilon$ and so the absolute value of the integral is at most $\frac12\cdot2\pi\epsilon=\pi\epsilon\to0$. $\endgroup$ – robjohn May 17 '15 at 1:27
  • $\begingroup$ Of course, thanks! $\endgroup$ – jwalk May 17 '15 at 15:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.