5
$\begingroup$

TL;DR: In simple combinatorics problems, is there a systematic way to detect overcounting before computing the counts and comparing them? Is it simple enough to be taught to undergrads:


At my university, we teach "Finite", a terminal math course for non-majors. It's very popular --- "popular" --- since it's required for gen ed and the business school. Roughly a quarter of the course is devoted to simple combinatorics. Here's a standard type of question:

You have a standard deck of playing cards (fifty two cards, four suits of thirteen cards each). You draw a hand of five cards. How many ways are there of drawing at least one card from each suit?

The correct answer is $C(4,1)C(13,2)C(13,1)^3$: First choose one suit to draw two cards from, then choose two cards from that suit, then choose one card from each of the remaining three suits.

However, if a student hasn't set the problem up quite correctly but still groks the basic idea of coming up with a method for selecting the hand and counting from it, they might think: First I'm going to draw one from each suit and then draw one from the remaining cards: $C(13,1)^4C(48,1).$

Problem: The second method double-counts every outcome.

Here's another standard sort of question:

You have five pens, four erasers, and three pencils. You draw three of them. How many ways are there of drawing at least two erasers?

The correct answer is $C(4,2)C(8,1) + C(4,3)$, since you can either draw two erasers and one other thing, or you can draw three erasers. However, a student might think: I'll draw two erasers, and then I'll draw one of the remaining ten things: $C(4,2)C(10,1)$.

Problem: The second method overcounts by eight.

These two overcounts are typical student mistakes. They're very subtle. They're of two different types -- one is a multiplicative overcount and another is an additive overcount. And I can't figure out how to quickly tell whether a method (e.g. "draw one from each suit, then draw a fifth card") will lead to an overcount. The best I can come up with is "do the problem correctly and compare the answer with the number they got."

What I'd like to do is figure out how to tell whether a method for finding an answer is an overcount without actually having to compute the number it gives and compare that to the correct count. I thought about this for a while, talked with another teacher, and we couldn't figure out how to teach students to identify and correct these mistakes. Of course, the first priority is teaching students to correctly break down the problem, but after that, it wasn't clear to us how best to instruct students to be aware of and correct these subtle counting errors.

Question: Is there a systematic way to catch and correct overcounting errors in simple combinatorics?

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ My thought as a student: when unclear, go with example. Of course, the most straightforward way would be counting configurations one by one. Therefore, you could create an analog version with a much smaller number of configurations, allowing brute force check to be possible. $\endgroup$
    – Linh
    Commented Feb 13, 2014 at 22:34

2 Answers 2

6
$\begingroup$

I don't know if it counts as "systematic", but what I always had to do when I was learning these things was ask myself "can I switch two objects between categories and still have a valid answer", and if so that was a problem. For instance: in example 1, I can switch the "extra" card with the "regular" card from the same suit and still have a valid hand, so I'm overcounting. In example 2, I can switch the "extra" eraser (if it's an eraser) with one of the other erasers and still have a valid outcome.

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ What do you mean in specific with 'switch the "extra" card with the "regular" card'? How do I see this from ${13 \choose 1}^4{48 \choose 1}$ $\endgroup$
    – bodokaiser
    Commented Mar 18, 2015 at 15:25
0
$\begingroup$

Try to find alternative ways of approaching the problem, solutions should have the decency of turning out the same.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .