In Munkres' 'Analysis on Manifolds' on pg. 208 there's a question which reads:

QUESTION: Let $f:\mathbb R^{n+k}\to \mathbb R^n$ be of class $\mathscr C^r$. Let $M$ be the set of all the points $\mathbf x$ such that $f(\mathbf x)=\mathbf 0$ and $N$ be the set of all the points $\mathbf x$ such that $$f_1(\mathbf x)=\cdots=f_{n-1}(\mathbf x)=0\text{ and } f_n(\mathbf x)\geq 0$$ Assume $M$ is non-empty.

1) Assume $\text{rank} ~ Df(\mathbf x)=n$ for all $\mathbf x\in M$ and show that $M$ is a $k$-manifold without boundary in $\mathbb R^{n+k}$.

2) Assume that the matrix $\displaystyle\frac{\partial(f_1,\ldots,f_{n-1})}{\partial \mathbf x}$ has rank $n-1$ for all $\mathbf x\in N$ and show that $N$ is a $(k+1)$-manifold with boundary in $\mathbb R^{n+k}$.

I am trying to show $(2)$ and I am not sure if the hypothesis of $(1)$ is required to do that.

I have approached this question using the constant rank theorem which dictates:

Constant Rank Theorem: Let $U$ be open in $\mathbb R^n$ and $\mathbf a$ be any point in $U$. Let $f:U\to \mathbb R^m$ be a function of class $\mathscr C^p$ such that $\text{rank } Df(\mathbf z) =r$ for all $\mathbf z\in U$. Then there exist open sets $U_1,U_2\subseteq U$ and $V\subseteq \mathbb R^m$ such that $\mathbf a\in U_1$ and $f(\mathbf a)\in V$, and $\mathscr C^p$-diffeomorphisms $\phi:U_1\to U_2$ and $\psi:V\to V$ such that $$(\psi\circ f\circ \phi^{-1})(\mathbf z)=(z_1,\ldots,z_r,0,\ldots,0)$$ for all $\mathbf z\in U_2$.

My approach to solve $(2)$ shall be clear by my solution of $(1)$:

Let $\mathbf a\in M$. We know that there exists $U$ open in $\mathbb R^{n+k}$ such that $\mathbf a\in U$ and $\text{rank }Df(\mathbf x)=n$ for all $\mathbf x\in U$. By the Constant Rank Theorem there exists open sets $U_1$ and $U_2$ in $\mathbb R^{n+k}$ and $V$ in $\mathbb R^n$ such that $\mathbf a\in U_1\subseteq U_1$ and $f(\mathbf a)=\mathbf \in V$, along with diffeomorphisms $\phi:U_1\to U_2$ and $\psi:V\to V$ satisfying $$(\psi\circ f\circ \phi^{-1})(\mathbf x) =(x_1,\ldots,x_n)$$ for all $\mathbf x\in U_2$. Say $\psi(\mathbf 0)=(t_1,\ldots,t_n)$ and define $S=\{(t_1,\ldots,t_n,z_1,\ldots,z_k):z_i\in \mathbb R\}\cap U_2$.

Claim 1: $\phi^{-1}(S)=M\cap U_1$. Proof: Let $\mathbf q=(t_1,\ldots,t_n,z_1,\ldots,z_k)$ be in $S$. Then $\phi^{-1}(\mathbf q)$ obviously lies in $U_1$. We now show that $\phi^{-1}(\mathbf q)$ lies in $M$. Note that $(\psi\circ f\circ \phi^{-1})(\mathbf q)=(t_1,\ldots,t_n)$. This gives $(f\circ \phi^{-1})(\mathbf q)=\psi^{-1}(t_1,\ldots,t_n)=\mathbf 0$. This means that $f(\phi^{-1}(\mathbf q))=\mathbf 0$ and hence $\phi^{-1}(\mathbf q)$ is in $M$. For the reverse containment assume that $\mathbf q\in M\cap U_1$. Then $\mathbf q=\phi^{-1}(\mathbf s)$ for some $\mathbf s\in U_2$. Also, $f(\mathbf q)=0$ since $\mathbf q\in M$. Thus $(f\circ\phi^{-1})(\mathbf s)=\mathbf 0$. Operating $\psi$ on both the sides we get $(\psi\circ f\circ \phi^{-1})(\mathbf s)=\psi(\mathbf 0)$. But the LHS of the last equation is $(s_1,\ldots,s_n)$ and the RHS is $(t_1,\ldots,t_n)$. Thus $s_i=t_i$ for $1\leq i\leq n$. Therefore $\mathbf s\in S$ and $\mathbf q\in\phi^{-1}(S)$. This settles the claim.

Now define $T=\{(z_1,\ldots,z_k)\in\mathbb R^k: (t_1,\ldots,t_n,z_1,\ldots,z_k)\in S\}$.

Claim 2: $T$ is open in $\mathbb R^k$. Proof: Define $g:\mathbb R^k\to \mathbb R^{n+k}$ as $$g(z_1,\ldots, z_k)=(t_1,\ldots,t_n,z_1,\ldots,z_k)$$ Clearly $g$ is injective and continuous. We now show that $g^{-1}(U_2)=T$. Note that $g^{-1}(U_2)=g^{-1}(S)$. Let $\mathbf q\in S$. Say $\mathbf q=(t_1,\ldots,t_n,q_1,\ldots,q_k)$ and it is obvious that $g^{-1}(\mathbf q)\in T$. Now let $g^{-1}(\mathbf q)\in T$ for some $q\in \mathbb R^{n+k}$. We need to show that $\mathbf q\in U_2$. Say $g^{-1}(\mathbf q)=(b_1,\ldots,b_k)$. Then $\mathbf q=(t_1,\ldots,t_n,b_1,\ldots,b_k)\in S$ and thus $\mathbf q\in U_2$.

So we have shown that $T=g^{-1}(U_2)$. Now since $g$ is a continuous function and $U_2$ is open in $\mathbb R^{n+k}$, we infer that $T$ is open in $\mathbb R^k$ and the claim is settled. Now define a function $\alpha:T\to M\cap U_1$ as $$\alpha(\mathbf z)=\phi^{-1}\circ g(\mathbf z)$$ It is a trivial matter to verify that $\alpha$ is a coordinate patch about the point $\mathbf a$ in $M$ and the proof is complete.

To solve $(2)$ what I did was define a function $g:\mathbb R^{n+k}\to \mathbb R^{n-1}$ as $$g(\mathbf x)=(f_1(\mathbf x),\ldots,f_{n-1}(\mathbf x))$$ Then $\text{rank }Dg(\mathbf x)=n-1$ for all $\mathbf x\in N$. Let $\mathbf z_0\in N$. I can show that there exists an open set $U\subseteq \mathbb R^{n+k}$ such that $\mathbf z_0\in U$ and $\text{rank }Dg(\mathbf z)=n-1$ for all $\mathbf z\in U$. Thereby, using the conastant rank theorem I get $U_1, U_2,\psi$ and $\phi$ such that $(\psi\circ g\circ\phi^{-1})(\mathbf x)=(x_1,\ldots,x_{n-1})$ Can somebody guide me what to do from here?

  • $\begingroup$ The typesetting problem is due to the indentation, you should remove it. $\endgroup$ – Carsten S Feb 21 '14 at 14:32

First, let us state the right hypotheses: one must assume that

(a) the matrix $\frac{\partial(f_1,\dots,f_{n-1})}{\partial\bf x}$ has rank $n-1$ for ${\bf x}\in N$ with $f_n({\bf x})>0$, and

(b) the matrix $\frac{\partial(f_1,\dots,f_n)}{\partial\bf x}$ has rank $n$ for ${\bf x}\in N$ with $f_n({\bf x})=0$.

Then $N$ is a $(k+1)$-manifold with boundary $N\cap\{f_n=0\}$.

That something more that 2) (or (a)) is needed can be seen in the example $$ f_1(x,y,z)=x,\quad f_2(x,y,z)=y^2-z^2. $$ Here $n=2, k=1$, $N$ consists of two opposite closed quadrants in the plane $x=0$, cleary not a manifold with boundary, the problem being at the origin. In this example the rank of the jacobian matrix at the trouble point is $1=n-1$, not $2=n$.

For the proof, one starts by noting that $N_0=N\setminus\{f_n=0\}=N\cap\{f_n>0\}$ is an open set in $M=\{f_1=\dots=f_{n-1}=0\}$ ($f_n$ is continuous), and $M$ is a boundaryless manifold of dimension $n+k-(n-1)=k+1$ by (a) (the 1) you have proved). Open sets of manifolds are manifolds, hence we are done for $N_0$. Now we turn to $N_1=N\cap\{f_n=0\}$ to see this is the boundary of $N$. Since the argument is a simple modification the one given for 1) I only sketch it. Fix a point $\bf p$ in $N_1$. By (b) the rank theorem gives new local coordinates $\bf x$ in an open nbhd $U$ of $\bf p$ in ${\mathbb R}^{n+k}$ whose first $n$ components are $f_1\equiv x_1,\dots,f_n\equiv x_n$ (again you proof of 1)). Then $$ N\cap U\equiv\{x_1=\cdots=x_{n-1}=0,x_n\ge0\},\quad N_1\cap U\equiv \{x_1=\cdots=x_{n-1}=0,x_n\ge0\}. $$ In other words, locally at $\bf p$ our $N$ is a semi $(k+1)$-plane (cut by $x_n$ in $x_1=\cdots=x_{n-1}=0$) with boundary $N_1$. This is the local model of a manifold with boundary as wanted.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.