I've managed to use identities to simplify it down to: $$r = 2\left(\cos^3\left({\theta\over2}\right)-3\sin\left({\theta\over2}\right)\cos\left({\theta\over2}\right)\right)$$ using trig identities, but I am stuck now. Does this have a Cartesian equivalent?


Hint. The difficulty is the half angle. So: $$\eqalign{r^2 &=4\cos^2\Bigl(\frac{3\theta}{2}\Bigr)\cr &=2\bigl(1+\cos(3\theta)\bigr)\ .\cr}$$ Now you should be able to write in various ways $\cos(3\theta)$ in terms of $\cos\theta$ or $\sin\theta$ or both, and the rest should not be too difficult. Good luck!

  • $\begingroup$ Of course! Why didn't I think of squaring the regular half angle identity. Thank you! I'll return when I've finished or run into another issue. $\endgroup$ – Keanu Vestil Feb 6 '14 at 5:06

I want to elaborate on David's answer but please give him the credit...

From David's result $$ r^2 = 2 ( 4 \cos^3(\theta)- 3 \cos(\theta)+1)$$ Now $\cos(\theta) = x/r$ and hence $$ r^2 = {{8\,x^3}\over{r^3}}-{{6\,x}\over{r}}+2$$ cross multiplying we get $$-8\,x^3+6\,r^2\,x+r^5-2\,r^3=0$$ Now substitute $r =\sqrt{y^2+x^2}$ to get $$y^4\,\sqrt{y^2+x^2}+2\,x^2\,y^2\,\sqrt{y^2+x^2}-2\,y^2\,\sqrt{y^2+x ^2}+x^4\,\sqrt{y^2+x^2}-2\,x^2\,\sqrt{y^2+x^2}+6\,x\,y^2-2\,x^3=0$$

Here is the plot (remember to use $\theta = 0 \cdots 4 \pi$)


The above graph was produced using Octave (a free software similar to Matlab) Here are the commands:

plot(r.*cos(theta), r.*sin(theta))
print -djpeg keanu.jpg

Added more info in response to OP's question:

You can isolate $\sqrt{y^2+x^2}$, square it to get

$$-y^{10}-5\,x^2\,y^8+4\,y^8-10\,x^4\,y^6+16\,x^2\,y^6-4\,y^6-10\,x^6 \,y^4\\+24\,x^4\,y^4+24\,x^2\,y^4-5\,x^8\,y^2+16\,x^6\,y^2-36\,x^4\,y^ 2-x^{10}+4\,x^8=0$$ [I used maxima to do the work for me!]

You can sweep $x$ from $-2$ to $2$ and solve for $y$ using "roots" command and plot the result to get the pattern that you see.

This method is not very efficient but can be used for quick checks: Here is octave script to check the plot. It has some extraneous solutions that have to be pruned (complex roots) but that is a lot more work!

hold on;
for x=-2:0.005:2 plot(x*ones(5,1), h(x), '.'); end
for x=-2:0.005:2 plot(x*ones(5,1), -h(x), '.'); end
hold off
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for going through and solving this out. I came to the same result. $\endgroup$ – Keanu Vestil Feb 6 '14 at 5:34
  • $\begingroup$ When I graph this relation, should it resemble the original polar equation? $\endgroup$ – Keanu Vestil Feb 6 '14 at 5:45
  • $\begingroup$ yes, except you have an implicit function to graph. $\endgroup$ – user44197 Feb 6 '14 at 5:46
  • $\begingroup$ When I graphed it using CountourPlot[] in Mathematica, it only appeared as one half of the original graph. However, replacing all the x's with (-x)'s reflected it across the y axis, therefore completing it. Is this just an issue with the square roots present? $\endgroup$ – Keanu Vestil Feb 6 '14 at 5:51
  • $\begingroup$ Perhaps, you went for $\theta=0 \cdot \cdot 2 \pi$. You need to go to $4 \pi$ since you have half angles. See my output $\endgroup$ – user44197 Feb 6 '14 at 5:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.