In a boolean algebra, $0$ (the lattice's bottom) is the identity element for the join operation $\lor$, and $1$ (the lattice's top) is the identity element for the meet operation $\land$. For an element in the boolean algebra, its inverse/complement element for $\lor$ is wrt $1$ and its inverse/complement element for $\land$ is wrt $0.$
A Boolean algebra can be defined to be a complemented lattice that is also distributive. For a distributive lattice, the complement of $x,$ when it exists, is unique. See Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_(order)#Complements_and_pseudo-complements).
The power set of a set $S$ is an example of Boolean algebra. $S$ is the identity for union and $\emptyset$ is the identity for intersection. However, for union, the complement of a set wrt $S$ is not unique; For intersection, the complement of a set wrt $\emptyset$ is not unique either. So is this a contradiction?
Thanks and regards!