0
$\begingroup$

I have this question: What is a separatrix of a equilibrium point of a continuous dynamical system and why it is flow-invariant? Thanks

Hello and thanks for the answer. I explain better. I'm following a first undergraduate course in dynamical systems. My professor gave me this definition of separatrix curve :

"Let be $\dot X=F(X)$ a planar dynamical system and let be $\hat X$ an equilibrium point. A differentiable curve $g:I\rightarrow\mathbb R^2$ is a stable separatrix for $\hat X$ if:

1) For every $P\in Im(g)$ the solution with initial condition $P$ exists for every $t\in[0,+\infty)$ and has $\hat X$ for limit as $t$ tends to $ +\infty $ .

2)For every $P\in Im(g)$ exists a neighborhood $U$ of $P$ such that for every $Q\in U-Im(g)$ the solution with initial condition $Q$ does not have $\hat X$ for limit as $t$ tends to $+ \infty$ . "

This is the definition...

Well, it seems to not work...

For example if i consider the system: $$\begin{cases} \dot x=-x \\ \dot y=0 \end{cases} $$ the basin of attraction of $(0,0)$ is the $x$ - axis and it should be even the (image of the) stable separatrix. Now, according to the definition, even the curve $g:(0,1)\rightarrow \mathbb R^2 $ , with $g(s)=(s,0)$ is a stable separatrix for $(0,0)$ . Now i also know that the image of the separatrix should be positively invariant...but g is not! Where i get wrong?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you give more mathematical context to this? It seems too terse to invite a lengthy explanation. Are you taking a math course in dynamical systems? $\endgroup$ – hardmath Jan 31 '14 at 17:18
  • $\begingroup$ For me, $x$-axis seems to be surely flow-invariant. Note that left half of $x$-axis and right half of $x$-axis are two distinct separatrices. $\endgroup$ – Evgeny Feb 1 '14 at 6:31
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the answer!That the x-axis is invariant is clear, what is not clear for me is: for my definition, the x-axis, the left half and the right- half of the x-axis are separatrices...so...how many separatrices there are? Where i get wrong? My definition is correct? Thanks! $\endgroup$ – user125242 Feb 5 '14 at 18:09
1
$\begingroup$

With this definition, the separatrices are exactly the differentiable curves $g:I\to\mathbb R^2$ such that $g(I)\subseteq\mathbb R\times\{0\}$. Thus, $g(I)$ can be any interval of the $x$-axis. There are more restrictive definitions of this notion, though.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.