1
$\begingroup$

Let $(X,\lVert\cdot\Vert_x)$ and $(Y,\lVert\cdot\Vert_y)$ be normed spaces, X be infinite dimensional and $T\in\mathcal{L}(X,Y)$ Which has the property: there exists $m>0$ such that $ \Vert{T x}\rvert|_Y \ge m\Vert{x}\Vert_X$ for all $x \in X $. Prove that $T$ cannot be a compact operator.

I tried to solve it. I have a idea but Im not sure. If $T$ is compact if and only if $T$ is continuous and It have to be closed and bounded.

I hope someone can help me.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Assume $T$ is compact. If $(x_n)$ is bounded in $X$, then there is a subsequence $(x_{n_k})$ such that $(Tx_{n_k})$ is norm-Cauchy. Using the given "bounded below" condition, what does this say about $(x_{n_k})$? $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Jan 27 '14 at 23:15
  • $\begingroup$ $x_{nk}$ is convergent @DavidMitra ? $\endgroup$ – Rabia K. Jan 27 '14 at 23:46
  • $\begingroup$ At this point we can at least say it is norm-Cauchy. So then, every bounded sequence, in particular every sequence in the unit ball of $X$, has a norm-Cauchy subsequence. What does this tell you? $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Jan 27 '14 at 23:48
  • $\begingroup$ Banach space that is weakly complete as well as norm compute so every bounded sequence in $X$ has a convergent subsequence .This means the unit ball of $X$ norm compact.@DavidMitra $\endgroup$ – Rabia K. Jan 28 '14 at 0:08
  • $\begingroup$ The only fact you need is that a normed space has a relatively compact unit ball if and only if it is finite dimensional (in fact if $X$ is infinite dimensional, there is a sequence $(x_n)$ of norm one vectors such that $\Vert x_n-x_m\Vert>1/2$ whenever $n\ne m$). So if $T$ is compact, then $X$ must be finite dimensional. $\endgroup$ – David Mitra Jan 28 '14 at 0:11
3
$\begingroup$

If a normed space $X$ is infinite dimensional, then the closed unit ball is not compact, neither precompact, which means that there exists a sequence $\{x_n\}\subset X$, without a Cauchy subsequence. In your case, as $\|Tx_i-Tx_j\|_Y\ge m\|x_i-x_j\|$, then the sequence $Tx_n$ does not have a Cauchy subsequence, and this implies that $T$ is not a compact operator.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for your answer @YiorgosS.Smyrlis $\endgroup$ – Rabia K. Jan 28 '14 at 10:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.