I am trying to understand why the set of discontinuities of an increasing function $f: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R$ must be finite or countable. I showed that such function can only have jump discontinuities. It is not clear to me why the discontinuities can't be uncountable and it is also not clear to me for given $f$ how to find a bijection between discontinuities of $f$ and a subset of $\mathbb Q$. Please can somebody explain me why it should be true?


At each jump, draw an open interval on the $y$-axis which fits in between the bottom of the jump and the top of the jump.

After you are done, you have a string of disjoint intervals on the $y$-axis (because the function is increasing.)

Now choose a rational number in each of these intervals. This gives you a bijection between the intervals and a subset of $\Bbb Q$.

The main idea is that there is a limit to how big a disjoint collection of open sets in $\Bbb R$ can be. The generalized idea is that of the Souslin number of a topological space. In a nutshell, it's "the largest cardinality of a set of disjoint open sets."

You can see that the same argument works with $\Bbb R$ replaced with any separable linearly ordered topological space.

  • $\begingroup$ I may be wrong, but I can't see why "increasing" prohibits an accumulation point. For example, consider jumps at $\left\{\frac{1}{n}\right\}$ and I don't believe your bijection works at $0$. $\endgroup$ – cderwin Jan 24 '14 at 14:06
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @dirtyderwin I am reading discontinuity here as "jump discontinuity" and I take it to mean a point $a$ where $\lim_{x\to a^-}f(x)<\lim_{x\to a^+}f(x)$. Between these two distinct numbers on the $y$-axis, you can fit an interval. The only way "increasing" is involved here is that it lets me conclude that the right limit is greater than the left, and that the intervals are disjoint. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Jan 24 '14 at 14:11
  • $\begingroup$ @dirtyderwin But yeah, if you read the question as "any discontinuity" including removable discontinuities, then the theorem just isn't true :) You can pluck out uncountably many points from a continuous curve and have a counterexample. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Jan 24 '14 at 14:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @rschwieb The function has to be defined in $\mathbb{R}$ so how do you pluck out points from its curve? $\endgroup$ – JiK Jan 24 '14 at 14:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @rschwieb To avoid any doubts about the existence of the (one-sided) limits, one can note $\sup f|_{(-\infty,a)}\le \inf f|_{(a,\infty)}$ with equality iff $f$ is continuous at $a$. Then continue as before, i.e. the intervals $(\sup f|_{(-\infty,a)}\le \inf f|_{(a,\infty)})$ are pairwise disjoint and the nonempty ones contain a rational. $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 24 '14 at 14:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.