4
$\begingroup$

I am trying to figure out how to reduce a 3SAT problem to a 3SAT NAE (Not All Equal) problem.

Not only that, I also figure out that I am not so sure about the reduction to 3SAT either.

Anyway, how do I go for that?

Since the size of each clause is already the same, I don't have to work on that. But I can't seem to find a way to create an instance I2 of 3SAT-NAE which is accepted iff the 3SAT accepts it.

EXTRA QUESTION: Does SAT (or 3SAT) allow any operation in the clauses? Because I always saw V (or) and never other operations. That confuses me a lot, because if it only allows V, then I don't get the reduction I found; but if it accepts even AND, then I get it.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ with NOT all Equal you mean: all clauses true but for a single one? And No: SAT and 3-SAT are in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conjunctive_normal_form that's why you'll always find $\lor$ inside the clause and $\land$ between them $\endgroup$ – b00n heT Jan 22 '14 at 17:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There must be at least 1 True and 1 False. {T,T,F} {F,F,T} {T,F,T} {F,T,F}.... The one you said is similar to OIT (On In Three) and wants exactly 1 True and 2 False. $\endgroup$ – N3sh Jan 22 '14 at 17:07
2
$\begingroup$

For the pedantic's sake, we first have a polynomial reduction $3SAT \leq_p s3SAT$, where the later has strictly 3 terms per clause, not less (as accepted by the former). This is achieved by taking an instance of $3SAT$ and mapping the clauses respectively:

$ (a) \mapsto (\lnot s \lor \lnot s \lor \lnot s) \land (s \lor s \lor a) $

$ (a \lor b) \mapsto (\lnot s \lor \lnot s \lor \lnot s) \land (s \lor b \lor a) $

where $s$ is a dummy variable, and a and b are terms where $\lnot \lnot$ is negated respectively. We concatenate the end result with $\land$. Clearly we construct in polynomial time.

Next we do the polynomial reduction $s3SAT \leq_p NAE-4SAT$, where the second is simply $NAE-3SAT$ but with four terms per clause. For this we take an instance of $s3SAT$ and map each clause as follows:

$ (x \lor y \lor z) \mapsto (x \lor y \lor z \lor s) \land (\lnot x \lor \lnot y \lor \lnot z \lor \lnot s)$

Where $x,y,z$ are terms and $s$ is our dummy variable, as before. Notice the symmetry here, if we find an assignment with $s = true$ we can simply invert the assignment to receive another valid assignment with $s=false$. This is the assignment we want.

As a last step we reduce $NAE-4SAT \leq_p NAE-3SAT$. Take an instance in $NAE-4SAT$ and map the clauses as follows:

$ (a \lor b \lor c \lor d) \mapsto (s \lor a \lor b) \land (\lnot s \lor c \lor d)$

All the same as before, concatenate the result once more. Notice here that if the true and false variable's (one of each must exist) are mapped to the same clause, $s$ can be choose appropriately. If they are mapped to different clauses, $s$ can be choose opposite to the respective variable value in each pair.

To summarize: $3SAT \leq_p s3-SAT \leq_p NAE_4SAT \leq_p NAE-3SAT$.

Answer to extra question: 3SAT only allows $\lor$ in the clauses.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.