2
$\begingroup$

Let $V$ be any $\mathbb{K}$-vector space with norm $\|\cdot\|$

I know that the Parallelogram law holds if the norm is induced by some inner product $\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle$, i.e.

$$ \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\left\|#1\right\|} \newcommand{\skp}[2]{\left\langle#1,#2\right\rangle}\begin{array}{rcl} \norm{a+b}^2+\norm{a-b}^2 &=& \skp{a+b}{a+b} + \skp{a-b}{a-b} \\ &=& \skp{a}{a+b}+\skp{b}{a+b} + \skp{a}{a-b}-\skp{b}{a-b} \\ &=& \skp{a}{a}+\skp{a}{b}+\skp{b}{a}+\skp{b}{b}+\skp{a}{a}-\skp{a}{b}-\skp{b}{a}+\skp{b}{b}\\ &=& 2\left(\skp{a}{a}+\skp{b}{b}\right) \\ &=& 2\left(\norm{a}+\norm{b}\right) \end{array}$$

However, Does the Parallelogram law hold if the norm is not induced by some inner product? Do you have a proof or a counter example for this case?

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ It's a common exercise that if the parallelogram law holds, the norm is induced by an inner product. Known as the polarization identity. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jan 16 '14 at 23:16
2
$\begingroup$

The paralelogram law holds if and only if the norm is induced by an inner product (over characteristic $\ne 2$):

Supposing the paralelogramma law,
Let $\langle a,b\rangle:=\displaystyle\frac12\left(\|a+b\|^2 - \|a\|^2-\|b\|^2\right)$.


For $\Bbb K=\Bbb C$, we can define a hermitian inner product:
Let $\langle a,b\rangle:=\displaystyle\frac14\left(\|a+b\|^2+i\|a+ib\|^2-\|a-b\|^2-i\|a-ib\|^2\right)$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Precisely that "The paralelogram law holds if and only if the norm is induced by an inner product." @user127001 $\endgroup$ – Pedro Tamaroff Jan 16 '14 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ I have updated my answer. Check that the given definitions are indeed inner products and that $\langle a,a\rangle=\|a\|^2$ in both cases. $\endgroup$ – Berci Jan 16 '14 at 23:36
  • $\begingroup$ I'm not aware of norm making sense for a general field because norm requires absolute value. For real numbers, it is not obvious that a norm which satisfies the parallelogram law must be generated by an inner-product. It is not easy to show that the expression for the inner-product that you have given is bilinear over the reals, for example. A continuity argument is required to prove such a thing. The same thing is true for the case of complex scalars, too. $\endgroup$ – DisintegratingByParts Jan 17 '14 at 6:59
2
$\begingroup$

It's a non-trivial exercise to show that $$ (a,b)=\frac{1}{2}(\|a+b\|^{2}-\|a\|^{2}-\|b\|^{2}) $$ actually defines an inner-product when the parallelogram law holds for a norm $\|\cdot\|$ over the field of real numbers. The scalar linearity can only be shown for rational numbers directly, and then a continuity argument is required to extend to all real scalars. The full proof is not simple, only assuming that $\|\cdot\|$ is a norm.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Do you know where I can find this kind of proof (full one)? I've been trying to show that every norm in $\mathbb{R}$ comes from an inner product. $\endgroup$ – DrHAL Sep 4 '16 at 4:12

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.