1
$\begingroup$

We'll show you two way of calculation of the Residue in consideration.

$$f(z) = \frac{z\sin(z)}{1-\cos(z)}$$

I'm interested to calculate the residues in $2\pi$ and $-2\pi$. I choose one of them.($2\pi$)

After checked the type of singularity(simple pole), I choose one of two manner to get the residue.

(1) $$\lim_{z\rightarrow 2\pi} \frac{z\sin(z)}{D(1-\cos(z))} = \lim_{z\rightarrow 2\pi} \frac{z\sin(z)}{\sin(z)} = \lim_{z\rightarrow 2\pi} z = 2\pi$$

(2) $$\lim_{z\rightarrow 2\pi} \frac{z\sin(z)}{1-\cos(z)} = \lim_{z\rightarrow 2\pi} \frac{z\sin(z-2pi)(z-2\pi)^2}{(1-\cos(z))(z-2\pi)} = 4\pi$$

Which of two I have to choose?

Thanks for the answers

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What is your $D$? $\endgroup$ – user87543 Jan 16 '14 at 10:47
  • $\begingroup$ It's the derivative of the argument. $\endgroup$ – Pixel Jan 16 '14 at 10:48
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, It's derivative of the argument. Sorry, I don't know very well Latex. $\endgroup$ – GenKs Jan 16 '14 at 10:49
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure If $\lim_{z\rightarrow 2\pi} \frac{zsin(z)}{1-cos(z)}$ gives you the residue.. $\endgroup$ – user87543 Jan 16 '14 at 10:52
  • $\begingroup$ @GenKs : Please look at Mr.Daniel's answer... the pole is not simple pole so your first procedure does not work... $\endgroup$ – user87543 Jan 16 '14 at 11:00
4
$\begingroup$

Here, the denominator has a double zero, which is partially compensated by a zero of the numerator to produce a simple pole altogether, thus the residue is not given by the formula

$$\operatorname{Res} \left(\frac{f(z)}{g(z)}; z_0\right) = \frac{f(z_0)}{g'(z_0)}$$

that one uses for simple zeros of the denominator.

If we write $f(z) = (z-z_0)\cdot f_1(z)$ with $f_1(z_0) = f'(z_0) \neq 0$, and $g(z) = (z-z_0)^2\cdot g_2(z)$ with $g_2(z_0) = \frac12 g''(z_0) \neq 0$, we see that the residue of $\frac{f}{g}$ in $z_0$ is

$$\operatorname{Res} \left(\frac{f(z)}{g(z)}; z_0\right) = \operatorname{Res} \left(\frac{(z-z_0)f_1(z)}{(z-z_0)^2g_2(z)}; z_0\right) = \frac{f_1(z_0)}{g_2(z_0)} = 2\frac{f'(z_0)}{g''(z_0)}.$$

That means your second way is correct.

More generally, if the denominator has a zero of order $n$, and the numerator a zero of order $n-1$ in $z_0$, the Taylor series of numerator and denominator start

$$\begin{align} f(z) &= \frac{f^{(n-1)}(z_0)}{(n-1)!}(z-z_0)^{n-1} + \dotsc,\\ g(z) &= \frac{g^{(n)}(z_0)}{n!}(z-z_0)^n + \dotsc, \end{align}$$

and the residue of $f/g$ in $z_0$ is then

$$\operatorname{Res}\left(\frac{f(z)}{g(z)}; z_0\right) = \frac{f^{(n-1)}(z_0)/(n-1)!}{g^{(n)}(z_0)/n!} = n\cdot \frac{f^{(n-1)}(z_0)}{g^{(n)}(z_0)}.$$

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you very much, Mr. Fischer. Just a last doubt: what's the reason of why we've chose the terms of taylor series of numerator and denominator of first and second order, respectively. is It associeted with the zero's order? $\endgroup$ – GenKs Jan 16 '14 at 11:29
  • $\begingroup$ Ah, I forget.. why is It partially compensated? How can we state this? $\endgroup$ – GenKs Jan 16 '14 at 11:32
  • $\begingroup$ It's because here, the numerator has a simple zero, and the denominator a double zero. If the zero of the numerator $f$ has order $k$, and the zero of the denominator $g$ order $k+1$, then $\frac{f}{g}$ has a simple pole, and the residue is the quotient of the $k$-th Taylor coefficient of $f$ and the $k+1$-th of $g$, which is $(k+1)\dfrac{f^{(k)}(z_0)}{g^{(k+1)}(z_0)}$. If the order of the zero of $g$ is more than one larger than the order of the zero of $f$, it gets more complicated. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jan 16 '14 at 11:35
  • $\begingroup$ Ok, now I understand much more. Mr. Fischer, thank you again for your clarification. $\endgroup$ – GenKs Jan 16 '14 at 11:41

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.