3
$\begingroup$

Here, I will try to prove a special case of Fermat's Last Theorem, namely when $a=b$ in this definition:

Fermat's Last Theorem

In number theory, Fermat's Last Theorem (sometimes called Fermat's conjecture, especially in older texts) states that no three positive integers a, b, and c can satisfy the equation $a^n + b^n = c^n$ for any integer value of $n$ greater than two.

Here's the proof:

Let's suppose the equation $x^n+x^n=y^n$ have one or more solutions where $n$ is an integer grater than $2$ and $x$ and $y$ are also integers. This means that $2x^n=y^n$, thus $\sqrt[n]{2}x=y$. But this is a contradiction since $\sqrt[n]{2}$ is irrational for every $n$ in $\Bbb N$, which implies that $y$ is irrational contradicting our second assumption. Therefore, the equation $x^n+x^n=y^n$ has no solution in $\Bbb N$.

Do you think it is right?

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ Yes, it is (assuming you can assume $\;\sqrt[n]2\notin\Bbb Q\;$ for $\;2\le n\in\Bbb N\;$ . $\endgroup$ – DonAntonio Jan 13 '14 at 11:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ By the way you can easily show that $\;\sqrt[n]2\notin\Bbb Q\;$. I will add an answer since I have more space to write... $\endgroup$ – Umberto Jan 13 '14 at 11:58
  • 7
    $\begingroup$ Al fine, though this is a very special case. $\endgroup$ – Hagen von Eitzen Jan 13 '14 at 12:05
5
$\begingroup$

To show that $\;\sqrt[n]2\notin\Bbb Q$ let's assume the contrary. Let's assume that two integeres exist $a$ and $b$ (let's take n>2) such that $$ \;\sqrt[n]2=a/b $$ with $a/b$ an irreducible fraction. Now is easy to see that $a$ must be even since $$ a^n=2b^n $$ therefore there must exist an integer $k$ such that $a=2k$ and therefore $$ 2^nk^n=2b^n $$ so it follows that $$ b^n=2^{n-1}k^n $$ and since $n>2$ also b must even. But that contradicts the hypothesis that $a/b$ si an irreducible fraction. QED

$\endgroup$
7
$\begingroup$

On the other hand, you can do the same by noting that $\sqrt[n]{2}$ is a root of

$$x^n - 2 = 0$$

and rational root theorem says that the only rational roots, if any, must be one of

$$\{-1, 1, -2, 2\}$$

none of which are proper candidates for $n > 1$, so $\sqrt[n]{2}$ is not rational.

Edit : Further, you can just use Gauss's lemma by noting that

$$x^n - 2$$

is irreducible over $\mathbb{Z}[x]$, as the sign changes occur in the interval $(2, 1)$ and the negative counterpart assuming for all $n > 1$, none of which contains integers, and thus by Gauss's lemma is also irreducible over $\mathbb{Q}[x]$.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

This question is old, but I think a little bit more general proof is :

let $f(x)$ denotes the number of prime factors of $x$. Then $f(a^n)=0 (\text{mod }n)$. If $n > 1$ and $p$ is a prime then $f(p(a^n))= 1 (\text{mod }n)$. So there is no solutions to $p(a^n) = c^n$.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.