3
$\begingroup$

I have to find the radius of convergence of some power series but I find myself in trouble for three of them : the series are

  • $\sum2^kx^{k!}$
  • $\sum\sinh(k)x^k$
  • $\sum\sin(k)x^k$.

For the first one I have tried the Ratio Test for series first but I don't kow how to deal with the factorials as exponents... For the second one, I'm tempted to say it never converges but I cannot prove it. And for the last one, I'd say it converges for $|x|< 1$ since $-1<\sin(h)<1$ anyway, but I'm not quite sure...

Some hints would help a lot! Thank you.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the edit user127001, it makes it much clearer but I didn't have LaTeX available here myself. $\endgroup$ – Kika Jan 7 '14 at 14:20
2
$\begingroup$

The first one is a lacunary series, it has a lot of zero coefficients. For such series, the ratio test cannot work. The generally applicable Cauchy-Hadamard formula, however, has no problems with the first series. The Cauchy-Hadamard formula says

$$\frac{1}{R} = \limsup_{n\to\infty} \lvert a_n\rvert^{1/n},$$

where $R$ is the radius of convergence, and the extreme cases are to be interpreted $\frac{1}{0} = \infty$ resp. $\frac{1}{\infty} = 0$. Here, the nonzero coefficients occur at the factorial indices, and

$$\limsup_{k\to\infty} \left(2^k\right)^{1/k!} = \limsup_{k\to\infty} 2^{1/(k-1)!} = \;?$$

For the second one, we can also use the Cauchy-Hadamard formula, or we can use the ration test, whichever way one chooses, the essential fact is that

$$\sinh t = \frac{e^t-e^{-t}}{2}$$

behaves for large $t$ essentially as $e^t$ ($e^t/2$, if one needs more accuracy).

For the third, the ratio test is not adequate, since the sine oscillates between $-1$ and $1$, but the Cauchy-Hadamard formula quickly settles the matter.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ I have no notion of lim sup and I'm not sure I get what you're doing with the first series... Can you explain? $\endgroup$ – Kika Jan 7 '14 at 14:58
  • $\begingroup$ In the first series, I'm ignoring all zero coefficients, since $\lvert a_n\rvert^{1/n}=0$ if $a_n=0$, only the nonzero coefficients influence the radius of convergence. The limes superior of a sequence of real numbers is the largest accumulation point of the sequence, formally, $$\limsup_{n\to\infty}b_n=\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\sup_{k\geqslant n}b_k\right).$$ It's an important concept, and I'm surprised it hasn't been treated at a point where you're asked to determine the radius of convergence of a power series. Read up on it in a good book. You will need it often. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jan 7 '14 at 15:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.