3
$\begingroup$

I solved the following exercise:

Let $\{r_1,r_2,r_3,\dots \}$ be an enumeration of the rational numbers and for each $n \in \mathbb N$ let $\varepsilon_n = 1/2^n$. Define $O = \bigcup_{n=1}^\infty V_{\varepsilon_n}(r_n)$ and let $F=O^c$.

(a) Argue that $F$ is closed and nonempty consisting only of irrational numbers.

(b) Does $F$ contain any nonempty open intervals? Is $F$ totally disconnected?

However I am now stuck with (c):

(c) Is it possible to know whether $F$ is perfect? If not, can we modify this construction to produce a nonempty perfect set of irrational numbers?

I tried and I can't do it but I would really like to know the answer. Of course it is not possible to know that $F$ is perfect because it might contain isolated points but can there be a perfect set of irrational numbers?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What are $V_{\varepsilon_n}(r_n)$ and $O^c$ ? $\endgroup$ – Gabriel Romon Jan 5 '14 at 13:30
  • $\begingroup$ Do you means all number in the set must be irrational, or you means the set must contains all irrational number? $\endgroup$ – Gina Jan 5 '14 at 13:32
  • $\begingroup$ Gina: he means the second one. Gabriel: $V_{\epsilon_n}(r_n)$ and $O^c$ are baby-Rudin notation for "the ball of radius $\epsilon_n$ about $r_n$" and "the set-compliment of $O$" respectively. $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jan 5 '14 at 13:41
  • $\begingroup$ @Gina I mean that it should be a possibly strict subset of the irrational numbers. $\endgroup$ – newb Jan 5 '14 at 14:56
  • $\begingroup$ @GabrielR. It denotes the open ball around $r_n$ or radius $\varepsilon_n$ and the other is the complement of $O$ in $\mathbb R$. $\endgroup$ – newb Jan 5 '14 at 14:57
0
$\begingroup$

Note that the existence of an isolated point in this construction requires a bit of a remarkable coincidence where two neighborhoods happen to share a border.

Note however, that by our construction, that border must be rational, which means that it is contained by some other neighborhood in $O$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The boundary points of all the $V_{\varepsilon_n}(r_n)$ are rational, so if two such sets have a common boundary point, that does not belong to $F$. The problematic situation is when the the boundary points of the $V_{\varepsilon_n}(r_n)$ approach an irrational $x$ from both sides, can it happen that $O$ contains $(x-\delta,x)\cup (x,x+\delta)$ for some $\delta > 0$? $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Jan 5 '14 at 14:15
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielFischer I'm not sure how I missed that. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – Omnomnomnom Jan 5 '14 at 14:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.