Why does Group Theory not come in here? Here is a list of questions that I find quite similar, for the one and only reason that they all show much "symmetry". Which is at the same time my problem, because I don't have a very precise notion of that supposed "symmetry". Here comes:

How prove this inequality $\frac{2}{(a+b)(4-ab)}+\frac{2}{(b+c)(4-bc)}+\frac{2}{(a+c)(4-ac)}\ge 1$
Interesting number theory questions
How find this inequality $\max{\left(\min{\left(|a-b|,|b-c|,|c-d|,|d-e|,|e-a|\right)}\right)}$
How to prove this inequality $\frac{x^y}{y^x}+\frac{y^z}{z^y}+\frac{z^x}{x^z}\ge 3$
A generalization of IMO 1983 problem 6
How prove this inequality $(a^2+bc^4)(b^2+ca^4)(c^2+ab^4) \leq 64$
Find max: $M=\frac{a}{b^2+c^2+a}+\frac{b}{c^2+a^2+b}+\frac{c}{a^2+b^2+c}$
How prove this inequality $\frac{a}{b+3}+\frac{b}{c+3}+\frac{c}{d+3}+\frac{d}{a+3}\le 1$

Take the last question as an example. Let $a=b=c=d$ , then $a^2+b^2+c^2+d^2=4\,$
is of course fulfilled, because we know that $a,b,c,d\ge 0$ , if and only if $a=b=c=d=1$ .
Nobody would be surprised (?) if $\;f(a,b,c,d)=a/(b+3)+b/(c+3)+c/(d+3)+d/(a+3)$ assumes
its one and only maximum $f(a,b,c,d)=1/4+1/4+1/4+1/4=1$ precisely for these equal values
of $(a,b,c,d)$ .
Very much the same phenomenon is observed with the other of the above questions.
The optimizing parameters turn out to be all equal, which often may be suspected beforehand: "due to symmetry".
It's frustrating that there seems not to exist a theorem somewhere that guarantees
a maximum or a minimum of a function when all variables in a problem with such high symmetry are just equal.I mean: sort of  formalization of "by symmetry" that helps us to find such solutions immediately.Now it is supposed that group theory is the discipline that should teach us a lot about symmetries.So the question is: why doesn't group theory routinely come in here?
Update. Unfortunately - and I think it's against the spirit of MSE as well - 
it often happens that the better answers are actually given as a
comment .
Indeed, a key reference for this sort of problems is:
Do symmetric problems have symmetric solutions?
It's only with help of this reference that I could (try to) answer another
such question .

Update. It's a continuing story:


How to prove this inequality $\sum_{cyc}\frac{a^2}{b(a^2-ab+b^2)}\ge\frac{9}{a+b+c}$


How to prove this inequality(7)?


How to prove this inequality $\sum_{cyc}\frac{x+y}{\sqrt{x^2+xy+y^2+yz}}\ge 2+\sqrt{\frac{xy+yz+xz}{x^2+y^2+z^2}}$


How to find the minimum value of this function?


Prove this inequality with $xyz\le 1$


And the list keeps growing ..
 A: Group theory does come in to these situations - and is in particular very important in physics - but you need to understand how.
There are plenty of examples in the comments of situations where symmetric (under the  exchange of variables) problems have asymmetric (under the  exchange of variables) extrema.
Suppose that a group $G$ acts smoothly on some variables $\mathbf x$, and is a symmetry of some function $f(\mathbf x)$. This means that $f(g\mathbf x) = f(\mathbf x)$ for all $g\in G$. For simplicity, let's suppose that $G$ is a matrix group, so $g \mathbf x$ is just a matrix multiplying a vector. For example, if $$G=\left\{\pmatrix{1 & 0\\ 0 & 1},\pmatrix{0 & 1\\ 1 & 0}\right\}$$ then this corresponds to leaving the variables alone or swapping them.
Now consider the set of, say, global maxima $S$. Take any $\mathbf y \in S$. Then notice that for any $g\in G$, $g \mathbf y$ has exactly the same properties. In particular, because $$f(g(\mathbf y + \delta \mathbf y)) = f(g\mathbf y + g\delta \mathbf y)$$ you can easily check that $g \mathbf y \in S$ too. (Clearly, $f$ has the same value here, and also if all small changes used to make $f$ smaller, then they still do.)
The result is that $G$ also acts on $S$ - it takes global maxima to global maxima. But it doesn't necessarily act trivially, which is the criterion you want: you want every element of $S$ to be invariant under every element of $G$.
A prominent example used in physics is the Mexican hat potential (which we'll use upside down for no good reason). Consider $f=-(|\mathbf x|^2 - a^2)^2$. This has the symmetry group $G = O(2)$ of all orthogonal two by two matrices because this preserves the length of $\mathbf x$. Clearly the function is biggest at $|\mathbf x| = a$, which is a circle, our set $S$. This is indeed acted upon by $G$: the circle is mapped into itself. However, the rotations and reflections act non-trivially - points on the circle are not left untouched by the group.
The set of local minima, by contrast, is $\{\mathbf 0\}$, which is acted upon trivially by $G$.
This in fact leads on to things like representation theory, where we ask what different possibilities there are for what $G$ can do to various vector spaces.
You can make the above into a single variable example by going to one dimension, where $|\mathbf x| = x$ and $G$ is roughly the example matrix group given above (really it is either leave $x$ alone or consider $x\mapsto -x$). The same thing applies.

Physicists make a big deal of these (spontaneous) symmetry breaking situations because they are key to the Higgs effect by which elementary particles apparently acquire mass. The group theory which governs the vacuum (the set $S$) is very important, and worth saying more about, but this isn't probably isn't the place!
