I have a question regarding tensors and basis changes, however upon searching the web I've found an infinity of definitions for tensors so I'll have to give the one I know first:

Given a vector space $E$ over a (commutative) field $F$, we call, for $p\ge 1$ a $p$-covariant tensor a map of the type $$ f:E\times\overset{\text{(p)}}{\dotsb}\times E\to F $$ where $f$ is $p$-linear (linear in each of the $p$ components). We call the set of $p$-covariant tensors (over $E$) $ T_p(E)$, which is the set of $p$-linear maps from $E$ to $F$, in other words, $T_p(E) = \mathcal L_p(E,F)$.

Next we define for $f \in T_p(E),\ g \in T_q(E)$ the tensor product of $f$ and $g$, as $f \otimes g \in T_{p+q}(E)$, where: $${f\otimes g : E\times\overset{\text{(p)}}{\dotsb}\times E\times\overset{\text{(q)}}{\dotsb}\times E \to F} \atop {(u_1,\dots,u_p,v_1\dots,v_q) \mapsto f(u_1,\dots,u_p)\cdot g(v_1\dots,v_q)} $$

For example, for $p=1, \ T_1(E) = E^*$. For arbitrary $p$, it can be shown that $T_p(E)$ is a vector space over $F$, and if $e_1,\dots,e_n$ is a basis for $E$, with dual basis $e_1^*,\dots,e_n^*$ ($e_i^*(e_j) = \delta_{ij}$) then a basis for $T_p(E)$ is $\{e_{i_1}^*\otimes\dots\otimes e_{i_p}^*\}_{1\le i_1,\dots, i_p\le n}$

My question regards 2-covariant tensors. For simplicity, say we have $\varphi\in T_2(E)$, and $E$ is two-dimensional with basis $e_1,e_2$. Then $T_2(E)$ has the ordered basis $B_e = \{e_1^*\otimes e_1^*, \ e_1^*\otimes e_2^*, \ e_2^*\otimes e_1^*, \ e_2^*\otimes e_2^*\}$ and $\varphi = (a,b,c,d)$ in this basis.

What I want to know is, if $B_u$ is a similar basis of $T_2(E)$ relative to basis $u_1, u_2$ of $E$, how can I express $\varphi$ in basis $B_u$, using the fact that I know the basis change matrix that changes from $e_1,e_2$ to $u_1,u_2$ in $E$? I know it has to do with a Kronecker product of matrices, but I don't quite understand how it works.


Let $B$ and $B'$ be two bases of $E$ and denote by $A$ the matrix of base change from $B$ to $B'$. First there are the induced dual bases on $E^\ast = T_1(E)$, denoted by $B^\ast$ and $B'^\ast$. The matrix of base change from $B^\ast$ to $B'^\ast$ is $A^\ast:= {}^t A^{-1}$ as you can easily check.

Now you have induced bases $\tilde{B}$ and $\widetilde{B'}$ on $E^\ast \otimes E^\ast := T_2(E)$ with your notations. The matrix of base change from $\tilde{B}$ to $\widetilde{B'}$ is the Kronecker product of $A^\ast$ with itself.

Look at the Wikipedia page if you don't know about Kronecker products.

I think that the best way to understand this stuff is to learn tensor products of vector spaces and not only tensor products of maps.

Edit: In order to prove these things, you have to write carefully the matrix of basis changes. Write $B = (e_1,\dots,e_n)$ and $B' = (f_1,\dots,f_n)$. By definition of $A$, $f_i = \sum_{j=1}^n A_i^j e_j$ (you can also adopt the other convention). Now you want the matrix from $B^\ast$ to $B'^\ast$. This matrix $C$ should satisfy $f_i^\ast = \sum_{j=1}^n C_i^j e_j^\ast$. Evaluating at $f_k$ you find, $\delta_i^k = \sum_{j=1}^n C_i^j e_j^\ast(f_k)$. But $f_k$ is $\sum_{l=1}^n A_k^l e_l$. So $\delta_i^k = \sum_{j=1}^n C_i^j A^j_k$. These equations are satisfied for $C = {}^t A^{-1}$ which shows the first part.

For the tensor product, you have to understand how to write $f_{j_1}^\ast \otimes f_{j_2}^\ast$ with $e_{i_1}^\ast \otimes e_{i_2}^\ast$. We have $f_{j_1}^\ast \otimes f_{j_2}^\ast = (\sum_{i_1} C_{j_1}^{i_1} e_{i_1}^\ast) \otimes (\sum_{i_2} C_{j_2}^{i_2} e_{i_2}^\ast) = \sum_{i_1, i_2} C_{j_1}^{i_1} C_{j_2}^{i_2} e_{i_1}^\ast \otimes e_{i_2}^\ast$.

Compare these coefficients with the definition of the Kronecker product; you find the same thing (with a certain ordering of the bases in $T_2(E)$).

  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, is a proof to be found somewhere? $\endgroup$ – GPerez Jan 3 '14 at 18:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.