4
$\begingroup$

Let $K$ be a field and $R_1,\dots,R_n$ DVRs of $K$ with $m_i$ the maximal ideal of $R_i$ and $R_i \not\subseteq R_j$ for $j\neq i$ . Define $A=\bigcap_{i=1}^n R_i$. Then $A$ is semilocal with maximal ideals $p_i=m_i\cap A$. Also, $A_{p_i}=R_i$. I know there is a $x_i \in p_i$ such that $x_i \not\in p_j$ for $i \neq j$ and $x_i \not\in p_i^2 A_{p_i}\cap A$.

Question: Why is $p_i=x_iA$?

I know $p_1,\dots,p_n$ are (pairwise) coprime and so for $p_1,\dots,p_{i-1}, p_i^2, p_{i+1},\dots,p_n$ but Matsumura's argument is unclear to me.

Reference: Theorem 12.2 in Matsumura, Commutative Ring Theory.

$\endgroup$
2
$\begingroup$

To prove that $p_i = x_iA$, you can do so locally, at every maximal ideal. Since $A$ is semilocal with maximal ideals $p_j$, and both $p_i, x_iA$ localize to the unit ideal in $A_{p_j}$ for $j \ne i$, it suffices to show that $p_iA_{p_i} = x_iA_{p_i}$. But this is true: $p_iA_{p_i} = m_i = x_iR_i = x_iA_{p_i}$ (as $x_i$ was chosen to be a uniformizing parameter for the DVR $R_i$).

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.