Is my proof correct? I have made use of the fact isomorphism preserves order of elements, which I proved couple of exercises back. I am also interested in other ways of proving it. Is there a more explicit way or is this explicit enough?

Problem Prove that the multiplicative groups $\mathbb{R} - \{0\}$ and $\mathbb{C} - \{0\}$ are not isomorphic.

Solution Recall that isomorphism preserves order of elements and hence if there exists an isomorphism from $\phi: \mathbb{C}-\{0\} \mapsto \mathbb{R}-\{0\}$, then $x \in \mathbb{C} - \{0\}$, and $\phi(x) \in \mathbb{R} - \{0\}$, then $\vert x \vert = \vert \phi(x) \vert$. Now note that the element $i \in \mathbb{C} - \{0\}$ has order $4$. However, no element in $\mathbb{R}-\{0\}$ has order $4$. Hence, no isomorphism can exist. Hence, the multiplicative groups $\mathbb{R} - \{0\}$ and $\mathbb{C} - \{0\}$ are not isomorphic.


  • $\begingroup$ This would be probably best way... I guess there would be no easier way.... well done! $\endgroup$ – user87543 Dec 28 '13 at 15:16
  • $\begingroup$ @DietrichBurde I am working on Dummit and Foote. So as I write down the solution, if I am unsure and have some questions, I ask for verification to make sure my understanding is correct. Is it not allowed on this website? $\endgroup$ – John Smith Dec 28 '13 at 16:49
  • $\begingroup$ Your argument also works with the real numbers under addition. $\endgroup$ – CopyPasteIt May 23 '17 at 14:14

Another way would be. Let's take $i$ and see what happen:
a) $f(i^2)=f(-1)=-1$, using basic properties of a morphism.
b) on the other side, we have $f(i)^2=x^2$ that can't produce -1.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.