1
$\begingroup$

There are two models $\mathfrak A$ and $\mathfrak B$ in class $K$.

$\mathfrak A = <P(\omega), \subseteq>$

$\mathfrak B = <P(\omega), \supseteq>$

Is the $Th(K)$ of a full theory of signature $\sigma = <P>$? P is two place predicate.

So what I made:

$Th(K)$ is full theory $\Leftrightarrow$ $\mathfrak A \equiv \mathfrak B$. I proved it.

I need to prove that $\mathfrak A \equiv \mathfrak B$. I think that $\mathfrak A$ and $\mathfrak B$ are isomorphic. But I did not get the right to construct an isomorphism.

I also have to prove that $\mathfrak M \equiv \mathfrak N$ where $\mathfrak M = <P(\omega), \subseteq>$ and $\mathfrak N = <P(\mathbb{Z}),\subseteq>$. I think that it looks very similar to previous question.

Could you help me please

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

Hint: The mapping that takes any subset $X$ of $\omega$ to $\omega\setminus X$ is a (partial order) isomorphism from $<P(\omega), \subseteq>$ to $<P(\omega), \supseteq>$.

For the problem about $P(\omega)$ and $P(\mathbb{Z})$, first note that there is a bijection $\varphi$ from $\omega$ to $\mathbb{Z}$. This induces a bijection $\varphi^\ast$ from $P(\omega)$ to $P(\mathbb{Z})$ which preserves $\subseteq$. Much more informally, $\mathbb{Z}$, as a set, can be viewed as $\omega$ with elements renamed. Precisely the same result will hold if $\mathbb{Z}$ is replaced by any countably infinite set.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.