7
$\begingroup$

I was under the impression that all 2-forms are the wedge $(\wedge)$ of two 1-forms. Is it possible to have a 2-form that you can't write as $A\wedge B$ with $A,B$ 1-forms?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ The question in your title is the opposite of the question in the body of your thread. Mariano is responding to the latter. $\endgroup$ – Ryan Budney Oct 6 '10 at 2:25
11
$\begingroup$

Yes, it is possible. (And you should find an example yourself: I will not deprive you of the joy of finding it :) )

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Would dA^dB+dC^dD (in R^4) be an example? It's a two form but it can't be written as A^B $\endgroup$ – JimJones Oct 6 '10 at 2:18
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ @JimJones: your example works, but you should not be satisfied until you have a proof of this. Just because you try to write it as the wedge of two one-forms and fail is of course not enough... $\endgroup$ – Pete L. Clark Oct 6 '10 at 2:44
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Mariano, awesome answer $\endgroup$ – BBischof Oct 6 '10 at 2:44
  • $\begingroup$ I still just don't understand $\endgroup$ – JimJones Oct 6 '10 at 12:51
  • $\begingroup$ @JimJones. I assume that $A,B,C,D$ in your first formula are functions... (Maybe I could add to Mariano's answer: simply look at the definition of 2-forms and remember something about linear independence.) $\endgroup$ – Agustí Roig Oct 6 '10 at 12:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.