7
$\begingroup$

If $x_1,x_2,\ldots,x_n>0$ and $x_1+x_2+\ldots+x_n=1$, prove that $$\frac{x_1}{1+x_2+x_3+\ldots+x_n} + \frac{x_2}{1+x_1+x_3+\ldots+x_n} +\ldots + \frac{x_n}{1+x_1+x_2+\ldots +x_{n-1}} \ge \frac {n}{2n-1}$$ This can easily be simplified: $$\frac{x_1}{2-x_1} + \frac{x_2}{2-x_2} +\ldots + \frac{x_n}{2-x_n} \ge \frac {n}{2n-1}$$

I could try using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality: $$\frac{x_1}{2-x_1} + \frac{x_2}{2-x_2} +\ldots + \frac{x_n}{2-x_n} = \frac{x_1^2}{2x_1-x_1^2} + \frac{x_2^2}{2x_2-x_2^2} +\ldots + \frac{x_n^2}{2x_n-x_n^2} \ge \frac{(x_1+x_2+\ldots+x_n)^2}{2(x_1+x_2+\ldots+x_n)-(x_1^2+x_2^2+\ldots+x_n^2)}=\frac{1}{2-(x_1^2+x_2^2+\ldots+x_n^2)}=\frac{n}{2n-(x_1^2+x_2^2+\ldots+x_n^2)n}$$

It's left to prove that $$(x_1^2+x_2^2+\ldots+x_n^2)n \ge 1$$ or $$(x_1^2+x_2^2+\ldots+x_n^2)n=1$$I can continue using the Cauchy-Schwarz inequality again: $$(x_1^2+x_2^2+\ldots+x_n^2)n=(x_1^2+x_2^2+\ldots+x_n^2)(1+1+\ldots+1)\ge(x_1+x_2+\ldots+x_n)^2=1$$ So I've proved it myself. (I've shown this proof after editing, I didn't post the question with the solution in the details. I found the proof a while after putting the question here).

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ disregard my response its incorrect $\endgroup$ Dec 22, 2013 at 19:14

4 Answers 4

6
$\begingroup$

For any $x,y \in (0,2)$, we have $$\frac{x}{2-x} - \frac{y}{2-y} = \frac{2(x-y)}{(2-x)(2-y)} = 2\left(\frac{x-y}{2-y}\right)\left[\left(\frac{1}{2-x} - \frac{1}{2-y}\right) + \frac{1}{2-y}\right] = 2\left(\frac{x-y}{2-y}\right)\left[\frac{x-y}{(2-x)(2-y)} + \frac{1}{2-y}\right] = \frac{2(x-y)^2}{(2-x)(2-y)^2} + \frac{2(x-y)}{(2-y)^2} \ge \frac{2(x-y)}{(2-y)^2} $$ Substitute $x$ by $x_i$ and $y$ by $\frac{1}{n}$ and then sum over $i$, we get

$$ \sum_{i=1}^n \frac{x_i}{2-x_i} - \frac{n}{2n-1} = \sum_{i=1}^n \left(\frac{x_i}{2-x_i} -\frac{\frac{1}{n}}{2-\frac{1}{n}}\right) \ge \frac{2}{(2-\frac{1}{n})^2}\sum_{i=1}^n \left( x_i - \frac{1}{n}\right) = \frac{2}{(2-\frac{1}{n})^2} \left(\sum_{i=1}^n x_i - 1 \right) = 0$$ The steps look almost magical. How do I come up with that? The answer is we are using Jensen's inequality from behind.

Jensen's inequality is actually more generic and applicable beyond differentiable functions. If you have any function $f(x)$ whose graph curved up on both side at every point, then Jensen's inequality works. Such functions are called convex functions. For any convex function $f(x)$, Jensen's inequality tells us:

$$\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i)\;\;\ge\;\; f(\frac{1}{n} \sum_{i=1}^n x_i)$$

This means if you want to verify $\sum_{i=1}^n f(x_i) \ge$ some number $M$. You just need to check what happens when all $x_i$ are equal to each other.

In this case, we are told we cannot use Jensen's inequality. So we expand our target function $f(x_i)$ around $\frac{1}{n}$, the mean of the $x_i$'s, and we are sure after we cancel the linear parts, the rest of the expansion will be non-negative.

$\endgroup$
4
  • $\begingroup$ The supposed link to Jensen's inequality is a repeat of the link to convex functions. $\endgroup$ Dec 22, 2013 at 22:31
  • $\begingroup$ @JohnBentin Oops, fixed that. thanks for pointing out the mistake. $\endgroup$ Dec 23, 2013 at 3:22
  • $\begingroup$ Is there a way of finding out whether a function is convex without using calculus? $\endgroup$
    – user26486
    Dec 26, 2013 at 16:48
  • $\begingroup$ @mathh, When dealing with complicated function, if possible, the first thing I do is make a plot of it. It usually give you a rough idea what you are dealing with. In this case, a plot of $\frac{x}{2-x}$ tells us it is convex over $[0,1]$. $\endgroup$ Dec 26, 2013 at 17:24
6
$\begingroup$

Writing ${\displaystyle {x_i \over 2 - x_i} = -1 + {2 \over 2 - x_i}}$, you have $$\frac{x_1}{2-x_1} + \frac{x_2}{2-x_2} +\ldots + \frac{x_n}{2-x_n} = -n + \frac{2}{2-x_1} + \frac{2}{2-x_2} +\ldots + \frac{2}{2-x_n}$$ So it suffices to show $$ \frac{2}{2-x_1} + \frac{2}{2-x_2} +\ldots + \frac{2}{2-x_n} \geq n + \frac{n}{2n-1}$$ This is the same as $$\frac{1}{2-x_1} + \frac{1}{2-x_2} +\ldots + \frac{1}{2-x_n} \geq \frac{n^2}{2n - 1}$$ Letting $y_i = 2 - x_i$, this is the same as showing $$\frac{1}{y_1} + \frac{1}{y_2} +\ldots + \frac{1}{y_n} \geq \frac{n^2}{2n - 1}$$ The condition $\sum_i x_i = 1$ translates into $\sum_i y_i = 2n - 1$. By the arithmetic-harmonic mean inequality, $$n\bigg(\frac{1}{y_1} + \frac{1}{y_2} +\ldots + \frac{1}{y_n}\bigg)^{-1} \leq {1 \over n}\sum_i y_i $$ $$= {2n - 1 \over n}$$ This is equivalent to what you want to show.

$\endgroup$
0
$\begingroup$

Hint: Use Jensen's inequality for f(x) = x/(2 -x)

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ it's quite simple. Jensen is an elaborate name for second derivative positive. Basically f(ax + by) < af(x) + bf(y) for a + b = 1 and f''(x) > 0. $\endgroup$
    – DeepSea
    Dec 22, 2013 at 19:11
  • $\begingroup$ I'm very young and haven't even started learning about derivatives at school, so sadly this solution won't work for me. $\endgroup$
    – user26486
    Dec 22, 2013 at 19:16
0
$\begingroup$

$\displaystyle x_1 + x_2 + ...+x_n = 1 =s$

$\sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{x_k}{1+s - x_k }= \sum_{k=1}^{n} \dfrac{s-(1-x_k +s)+1}{1+s -x_k}=- n+\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{s+1}{s+1 - x_k}= \\ -n +\sum_{k=1}^n \frac{1}{1-\frac{x_k }{s+1}}\geqslant _{bergstrom} ~~-n +\dfrac{n^2}{n-\frac{s}{s+1}}= -n +\frac{2n^2 }{2n -1}= \\ = \frac{n}{2n-1}$

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .