# Jointly Gaussian uncorrelated random variables are independent [closed]

Let $X,Y$ be jointly normally distributed and uncorrelated. Why are they independent?

In short, they are independent because the bivariate normal density, in case they are uncorrelated, i.e. $\rho =0$, reduces to a product of two normal densities the support of each one ranges from $(-\infty, \infty)$. If the joint distribution can be written as a product of nonnegative functions, we know that the RVs are independent. Moreover, we know, and can show, that each marginal density is normal on its own.

That is easy to see in the bivariate density below:

$$f(x,y)= \frac{1}{2 \pi \sigma_1 \sigma_2 \left( 1-\rho^2 \right)^{1/2}} \exp\{-q/2 \}, \quad -\infty<x<\infty,\quad -\infty<y<\infty$$

where $$q= \frac{1}{1-\rho^2} \left[ \left( \frac{x-\mu_1}{\sigma_1} \right)^2-2\rho \left(\frac{x-\mu_1}{\sigma_1} \right) \left(\frac{y-\mu_2}{\sigma_2} \right)+\left(\frac{y-\mu_2}{\sigma_2} \right)^2 \right]$$

Put $\rho=0$. There is also a nice proof involving mfgs. Is that what you were looking for?

• Thank you! I knew this formula for the joint density, but forgot that the $\rho$ is actually the correlation coefficient. It makes perfect sense now! Dec 17, 2013 at 14:22
• What if the covariance matrix is singular so there is no density? How can you show independence then? Oct 25, 2023 at 3:28

Consider a simple example. Let X have a standard normal distribution. Let Z be independent of X, with Z equally likely to be +1 or -1 (i.e., Pr[Z=+1] = Pr[Z=-1] = 1/2). Let Y = X Z (the product of X and Z). Then it is easy to see that Y also has a standard normal distribution, and that Cov(X,Y) = 0. On the other hand, clearly X and Y are not independent: indeed, it always holds that |X| = |Y|. The point is that, just because each of X and Y has a normal distribution, that does not mean that the pair (X,Y) has a bivariate normal distribution, nor even that (X,Y) is jointly absolutely continuous, nor does it mean that zero covariance implies independence.

• I said "jointly normally distributed"! Under this assumption the claim is true. Dec 16, 2013 at 23:50
• What you are saying is nice to know, but Balerion is right. Action is needed here. If you do not want to delete your answer (as I said, it is nice to know) then at least edit and make clear in it that it is not really an answer to the question of the OP. Dec 17, 2013 at 10:15