1
$\begingroup$

I'm going to find an example of uniform algebra and show that satisfying the definition.

Example: Show that The Gelfand transform $\widehat{f}$ is uniform algebra.

We know that:

  • A uniform algebra is a closed subalgebra $\mathcal A$ of the complex algebra $C(X)$ that contains the constants and separates points. Here $X$ is a compact Hausdorff space.

  • The Gelfand transform of $f$ is the function $\widehat{f}$ defined on $M_{\mathcal A}$ in the following way:

$$\begin{align}\widehat{f}: M_{\mathcal A} &\to \Bbb C\\ \varphi &\mapsto \widehat{f}(\varphi)=\varphi(f), \forall \varphi \in M_{\mathcal A} \end{align}$$

How can we show that $\widehat{A}$ such that $3$ conditions above?

=================================

After a period of time to think about my problem which I posted above, I'll write it here:

Let $\widehat{\mathcal A}=\{\widehat{f}: \ f \in \mathcal A \}$

$1$. $\widehat {\mathcal A} \ $ contains the constants

Because $e \in \mathcal A \implies \widehat{e}(\varphi)=\varphi (e)=1, \ \forall \varphi \in M_{\mathcal A}$.

Therefore, $\widehat{(\lambda e)}(\varphi)=\varphi(\lambda e)=\lambda \varphi(e)=\lambda,\ \forall \lambda \in \Bbb C$.

Hence, $\widehat {\mathcal A} \ $ contains the constants

$2$. $\widehat {\mathcal A} \ $ separates points

We assume that $\varphi_1,\ \varphi_2 \in M_{\mathcal A}$ such that $\widehat{f}(\varphi_1)= \widehat{f}(\varphi_2),\ \forall f \in \mathcal A$.

Whence, $\varphi_1(f)= \varphi_2(f),\ \forall f \in \mathcal A$. So $\varphi_1= \varphi_2$.

Hence, $\widehat {\mathcal A} \ $ separates points

===========================

$3$. Now I have stuck when I try to show $\widehat {\mathcal A}$ is a closed subalgebra of algebra Banach $C(M_{\mathcal A})$

I think that we have $\widehat{f}$ is continuous, because $\left |\widehat{f}(\varphi ) \right |=\left | \varphi (f) \right |\le \left \| \varphi \right \|\cdot \left \| f \right \|=\left \| f \right \|$

But How can we prove The first condition (i.e $\widehat {\mathcal A}$ is a closed subalgebra of algebra Banach $C(M_{\mathcal A})$)

I don't remember the definition of closed subalgebra. Can anyone post it help me!

Any help will be appreciated! Thanks!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ What do you mean by "How can we show that $\hat{A}$ such that 3 conditions above?"? $\endgroup$ – Prahlad Vaidyanathan Dec 14 '13 at 4:27
  • $\begingroup$ I mean: $\widehat {\mathcal A}$ such that: contains the constants, closed subalgebra, separates points. Do you understand? $\endgroup$ – kimtahe6 Dec 14 '13 at 4:29
  • $\begingroup$ But I don't remember the definition of closed subalgebra. It's $\alpha f \in \widehat {\mathcal A}$ and $f+g \in \widehat {\mathcal A},\ \forall \alpha \in \Bbb C,\ f,\ g \in \widehat {\mathcal A}$. And $\{f_n\} \subset \widehat {\mathcal A}, \ f_n \to f \in \mathcal A \implies f \in \widehat {\mathcal A}$. Is it correct? $\endgroup$ – kimtahe6 Dec 14 '13 at 4:33
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You want to show that $\hat{f_n} \to g \in C(M_A)$, then $g \in \hat{A}$ $\endgroup$ – Prahlad Vaidyanathan Dec 14 '13 at 4:37
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, hihi :) , thanks Prahlad Vaidyanathan. Can you help me? $\endgroup$ – kimtahe6 Dec 14 '13 at 4:41
1
$\begingroup$

You know that $$ \|\hat{f}\|_{C(M_A)} = \|f\|_{C(X)} $$ $\|\hat{f}\|_{C(M_A)} \leq \|f\|_{C(X)}$ as you have mentioned in your post, and, for each $x\in X$, define $\varphi \in M_A$ by $f \mapsto f(x)$, then $$ |f(x)| = |\varphi(f)| \leq \|\hat{f}\|_{C(M_A)} $$ This is true for all $x \in X$, and hence $\|f\|_{C(X)} \leq \|\hat{f}\|_{C(M_A)}$

Hence, $f \mapsto \hat{f}$ is an isometry from the Banach space $A$ to the Banach space $C(M_A)$. Hence it must have closed range.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks Prahlad Vaidyanathan. But I have 2 questions: 1/ I think that $f \mapsto \hat{f}$ is an isometry iff $\left \| f^2 \right \|=\left \| f \right \|^2, \ \forall f \in \mathcal A$? 2/ Since $\left |\widehat{f}(\varphi ) \right |=\left | \varphi (f) \right |\le \left \| \varphi \right \|\cdot \left \| f \right \|=\left \| f \right \|$ then $\left \|\widehat{f} \right \|_{C(M_{\mathcal A})} \le \left \| f \right \|_{C(X)}$. But I don't understand How to take $\varphi$ to be the evaluation maps (proof?) $\endgroup$ – kimtahe6 Dec 14 '13 at 7:44
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. I see :). Since $\|\hat{f}\|_{C(M_A)} = \|f\|_{C(X)}$ then we're done. I'm sorry can you prove $\left \|\widehat{f} \right \|_{C(M_{\mathcal A})} \ge \left \| f \right \|_{C(X)}$?? $\endgroup$ – kimtahe6 Dec 14 '13 at 7:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.