0
$\begingroup$

Let $R=k[X_1,...,X_n]$ be a polynomial ring, where $k$ is a field.

Suppose we have a Gröbner basis $G = (g_1, g_2, ... , g_n), g_i \in R$ for the ideal $I = \langle f_1, f_2, ..., f_m \rangle, f_i \in R$ and that we have using the division algorithm for polynomials in several variables that $f^G = 0$ for $f \in R$ (remainder from division by $G$ is $0$).

Since $f \in I$ if and only if $f^G = 0$ we know that $f \in I$.

Now we want to write $f= a_1f_1 + \cdots + a_nf_n$ for $a_i \in R$ as a $k$-linear combination of the polynomials generating $I$. We know we can do this, since we assumed that $f^G = 0$.

We can easily write $f$ as a $k$-linear combination of the polynomials in $G$, since the remainder is unique and $0$ for every permutation of $G$. So let $f = b_1 g_1 + \cdots + b_n g_n$.

Can I use this to easily find a way to write $f= a_1f_1 + \cdots + a_nf_n$ ?

It can be tiredsome to to write $f$ as a $k$-linear combination of polynomials $f_i$, since there are several path to take during the algorithm.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ A $k$-linear combination means that the coefficients are in $k$, but in your question they are in $R$. $\endgroup$ – user26857 Dec 12 '13 at 21:11
1
$\begingroup$

If you found $G$ using Buchberger's algorithm then you constructed them as linear combinations of the $f_i$. You can then substitute these expressions into $f = \sum b_ig_i$ to get $f$ as a linear combination of the $f_i$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Why ? I start with a set of polynomials $F=(f_1, f_2, ..., f_n)$ and using Buchbergers algorithm I add $S(f_i, f_j)^F$ to $F$ to get $F^{'}=(f_1,f_2,...,f_n,S(f_i, f_j)^F)$ where $S(f_i, f_j)^F$ denote the remainder of the $S$-polynomial $S(f_i, f_j)$ after division by $F$. Is it because I can write $$S(f_i, f_j) = a_1 f_1 + a_2 f_2 + ... + a_n f_n + S(f_i, f_j)^F \Rightarrow S(f_i, f_j)^F = -a_1 f_1 - a_2 f_2 - ... - a_n f_n + S(f_i, f_j)$$ and $S(f_i, f_j)$ is a linear combination of $f_i$ and $f_j$ thus getting $S(f_i, f_j)^F$ written purely in terms of $F$? $\endgroup$ – Shuzheng Dec 12 '13 at 16:32
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, that is exactly why. $\endgroup$ – Jim Dec 12 '13 at 17:54
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot Jim, this makes my work easier when I need to express $f$ in term of the ideal $I$ after confirmed that $f$ actually lies in $I$ :). $\endgroup$ – Shuzheng Dec 12 '13 at 18:47

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.