2
$\begingroup$

I was thinking about the following problem:

Let $(A_t)_{t \geq 0}$ be a family of bounded operators on a Banach space $X$ which is uniformly bounded and let $(B_{t,\alpha})$ be a net in the Banach algebra of bounded operators on $X$ such that $B_{t,\alpha}$ converges in weak operator topology to $A_t$ for all $t\geq 0$, that is $f(B_{t,\alpha}x) \to f(A_tx)$ for all $x \in X$, $f \in X^*$ and $t \geq 0$.

Is it true that $(B_{t,\alpha})$ has to be uniformly bounded?

What if we assume the uniform boundedness of the net, does it imply the uniform boundedness of the limit?

Thank you for any help.

$\endgroup$
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ Since even a net $(T_\alpha)_{\alpha \in A}$ that converges to $T$ in the norm topology of $\mathcal{B}(X)$ need not be bounded, no, $(B_{t,\alpha})$ need not be uniformly bounded. If $\lVert B_{t,\alpha}\rVert \leqslant M$ for all $t,\alpha$, then you also have $\lVert A_t\rVert \leqslant M$ for all $t$. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Dec 11 '13 at 12:33
  • $\begingroup$ I think you can write it as an answer, could you also give such an example of a net, please? $\endgroup$ – Deyton Dec 11 '13 at 12:50
4
$\begingroup$

A convergent net in a Banach space need not be bounded. A trivial (and admittedly uniteresting) example is

$$(x_\alpha)_{\alpha \in (0,\infty)};\quad x_\alpha = \alpha^{-1}\cdot x$$

for some $x \neq 0$, where $(0,\infty)$ is a directed index set with the usual order. Of course for every norm-convergent net $x_\alpha \to x$, there is an $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that the "tail" $(x_\alpha)_{\alpha \geqslant \alpha_0}$ is bounded, so for the norm topology, there are no really interesting examples of unbounded convergent nets. For the weak topology, there are (in the infinite-dimensional case) more interesting examples of unbounded convergent nets, although explicitly constructing one is not easy.

If the system of weak neighbourhoods of $0$ has the same cardinality as $(0,\infty)$, choose a bijection $\nu \colon \mathscr{V}_w(0) \to (0,\infty)$, and for every $U \in \mathscr{V}_w(0)$ choose an $x_U \in U$ with $\lVert x_U\rVert = \nu(U)$. Since every weak neighbourhood of $0$ contains an infinite-dimensional subspace, such an $x_U$ exists. Then the net $(x_U)_{U \in \mathscr{V}_w(0)}$, where $\mathscr{V}_w(0)$ is directed by reverse inclusion, is a net converging to $0$ in the weak topology, but it is unbounded, and most likely it has no bounded "tails" $(x_U)_{U \subset W}$.

So the answer to the first question is no, the family $(B_{t,\alpha})$ has no reason to be uniformly bounded.

For the second question, the answer is yes, if $\lVert B_{t,\alpha}\rVert \leqslant M$ for all $t,\alpha$, then $\lVert A_t\rVert \leqslant M$ for all $t$, so the family $(A_t)_{t\geqslant 0}$ of limits is uniformly bounded too. For every $x$ and $f$, we have for every $t$

$$\lvert f(A_t x)\rvert = \lim_{\alpha} \lvert f(B_{t,\alpha} x)\rvert \leqslant \lVert f\rVert \cdot M\cdot \lVert x\rVert,$$

and hence $\lVert A_t x\rVert \leqslant M\cdot \lVert x\rVert$.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.