# Limit Supremum / finite limit meaning

I'm a little confused about the definition of limit supremum; what does it mean that the following limit is finite?

$$\limsup _{h\rightarrow \infty}\;\sup_{x\in \mathbb R}\; A(x,h)$$ where $A(x,h)$ is a function of $x$, and $h$.

• Does it mean anything? Looks to me like you're binding $h$ twice. Did you mean something like $\displaystyle \limsup_{h \to \infty}\ \sup_{x \in \mathbb R}\ A(x,h)$? Aug 28, 2011 at 0:38
• Exactly, but I have no idea how to make it like this!
– Joan
Aug 28, 2011 at 0:41
• You can right-click the expression in my comment and select "Show Source" to see how I did it. Aug 28, 2011 at 0:44
• There are many different ways of defining the limit superior; one of them is the following: the limit superior is the supremum of the set of limit points. Aug 28, 2011 at 3:13
• This question seems to be related: math.stackexchange.com/questions/49699/… Aug 28, 2011 at 10:05

It means that there exists some finite $H$ and $C$ such that for every $h\ge H$ and every $x$ in $\mathbb R$, $A(x,h)\le C$.

Proof:

If $H$ and $C$ as above exist, then $\limsup\limits_{h\to+\infty}\,\sup\limits_{x\in\mathbb R}A(x,h)\le C$ hence it is finite.

To prove the other direction, first recall that, for any function $B$ and any finite $c$, $\limsup\limits_{h\to+\infty}\,B(h)\le c$ means that, for every $c'>c$, there exists a finite $h_0$ such that $B(h)\le c'$ for every $h\ge h_0$.

Hence $\limsup\limits_{h\to+\infty}\,B(h)$ is finite if and only if there exists some finite $C$ and $H$ such that $B(h)\le C$ for every $h\ge H$.

Apply this to $B(h)=\sup\limits_{x\in\mathbb R}A(x,h)$, hence $B(h)\le C$ for every $h\ge H$. Now, $A(x,h)\le B(h)$ for every $x$ in $\mathbb R$ and $B(h)\le C$ for every $h\ge H$, hence $A(x,h)\le C$ for every $h\ge H$ and $x$ in $\mathbb R$.

Done.