0
$\begingroup$

$$\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{(-1)^n}{n^a\ln n}$$ $$a>0$$

Does the series converge/converge absolutely/diverge ?

I tried to divide to cases and factor the series:

$\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{(-1)^n}{n^a\ln n}=\sum\frac{(-1)^n}{n^a}\sum\frac{1}{\ln n}$

for $a \le 1$ the series $\sum\frac{(-1)^n}{n^a}$ converges (from Leibniz), and doesn't converge absolutely but $\sum\frac{1}{\ln n} $ diverges. So I guess factoring the series into two is not how to solve this.

Now trying the condensation test:

$\sum^{\infty}_{n=1}\frac{2^n(-1)^{2^n}}{{2^n}^a\ln 2^n} \Rightarrow \frac{2^{n(1-a)}}{\ln 2^n}$

If $a \ge 1$ it goes to infinity.

If $a \le 1$ it also goes to infinity.

I think I'm doing somthing wrong.

Any advice ?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This is an alternating series. Try out the Leibniz test-en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternating_series_test $\endgroup$ – GTX OC Dec 7 '13 at 10:26
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ The condensation test is for monotonically non-increasing terms, not for alternating terms. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Dec 7 '13 at 10:26
  • $\begingroup$ Right, so it does converge for all a. and converge absolutely for $a > 1$ and doesn't converge absolutely for $a \le1$. $\endgroup$ – GinKin Dec 7 '13 at 10:39
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The step where you factor the series is not valid. There is no rule that says that $$\sum_na_nb_n=\sum_na_n\sum_nb_n$$ You would only use the condensation test for the absolute convergence. $\endgroup$ – robjohn Dec 7 '13 at 12:09
2
$\begingroup$

The alternating series test says that $$ \sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac{(-1)^n}{n^a\log(n)} $$ converges conditionally since $\frac1{n^a\log(n)}$ monotonically converges to $0$.

For absolute convergence, by comparison to $$ \sum_{n=3}^\infty\frac1{n^a} $$ the series converges absolutely for $a\gt1$.

For $a=1$, the integral test shows that the series diverges absolutely since $$ \int_2^M\frac1{x\log(x)}\,\mathrm{d}x=\log(\log(M))-\log(\log(2)) $$ diverges as $M\to\infty$.

If you can't use the integral test, you can use the condensation test for $a=1$: $$ \sum_{n=1}^\infty2^n\frac1{2^n\log(2^n)}=\frac1{\log(2)}\sum_{n=1}^\infty\frac1n $$ diverges since the harmonic series diverges.

Since the series diverges for $a=1$, the comparison test with $$ \sum_{n=2}^\infty\frac1{n\log(n)} $$ shows that the series diverges absolutely for $a<1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ so it converge absolutely for any $a$? $\endgroup$ – guynaa Dec 7 '13 at 11:56
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @guynaa: no. The alternating series test only works for conditional convergence. I noticed the part of the question regarding absolute convergence and added a section on absolute convergence. $\endgroup$ – robjohn Dec 7 '13 at 12:02
  • $\begingroup$ We can't use integrals yet. Can we use that comparison test for $ a \le 1$ ? $\endgroup$ – GinKin Dec 7 '13 at 12:10
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You can use comparison for $a\lt1$, but for $a=1$, you can use the condensation test. $\endgroup$ – robjohn Dec 7 '13 at 12:13
1
$\begingroup$

Firstly note that your series should be $$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{n^a \ln n}$$ since the logarithm function becomes zero at $n=1$. Let us consider the absolute valued series first,

$$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^a \ln n}$$

Note that,

$$\frac{1}{n^a \ln n}<\frac{1}{n^a}\mbox{ for }n\geq 3$$

Hence by the direct comparison test we have $\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^a \ln n}$ converges when $a>1$. That is $\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{(-1)^n}{n^a \ln n}$ absolutely converges when $a>1$.

Ir remains to show the case $a\leq 1$. I still haven't come with a method for that. :)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can't you just compare it to 1/n for $a \le 1$? $\endgroup$ – GinKin Dec 7 '13 at 11:09
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Well the comparison test only works when all the terms of the series are positive. But in this case you have a alternating series. If you take the absolute valued seres, $\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}\frac{1}{n^a \ln n}$ then using the limit comparison test with $1/n$ is useless because $\sum\frac{1}{n}$ diverges and then we cannot imply anything about our original series. $\endgroup$ – user112535 Dec 7 '13 at 11:21
  • $\begingroup$ Rather than using the above method, I now realize that this could be solved using the alternating series test. :) $\endgroup$ – user112535 Dec 7 '13 at 11:51

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.