1
$\begingroup$

Let (X,d) be a metric space and A,B $\subset$ X be two compact subsets. Show $A\cap B$ is also compact.

I attempted this question by showing the intersection is bounded and closed.

But I stated that Bounded and Closed $\Rightarrow$ Compact (Heine-Borel) but I didn't realise this only holds for $\mathbb R^n$.

Most of the other similar problems on here were dealing with $\mathbb R^n$, so how would you go about showing this for a general space X?

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Refer to "Topology of Metric Spaces" by S Kumaresan. $\endgroup$ – Shiva Prakash Dec 6 '13 at 12:22
5
$\begingroup$

In metric space, any compact subset is closed. In particular, this means $X \setminus B$ is open. For any open cover $\mathscr{O}$ of $A \cap B$, $\mathscr{O} \cup \{ X \setminus B \}$ will be an open cover of $A$. Since $A$ is a compact, $\mathscr{O} \cup \{ X \setminus B \}$ has a finite sub-cover $\mathscr{F}$. It is easy to see $\mathscr{F} \setminus \{ X \setminus B \}$ is a finite sub-cover of $\mathscr{O}$ for $A \cap B$. Since the open cover $\mathscr{O}$ is arbitrary, $A \cap B$ is compact.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ This makes a lot of sense, thanks! So just to clarify the definition of compactness, in $R^n$ you can say $A\ Compact \Leftrightarrow A\ bounded \wedge A\ closed$ but for a general metric space X $\ A \ Compact \Rightarrow A\ bounded \wedge A\ closed$ $\endgroup$ – user113867 Dec 8 '13 at 12:19
  • $\begingroup$ @user113867 Compactness is a pure topological concept (compactness = every open cover has finite sub-cover). What you say is not the definition of compactness but they are true. $\endgroup$ – achille hui Dec 8 '13 at 14:30
4
$\begingroup$

This is true for arbitrary Hausdorff spaces, not only for metric spaces.

Try to prove the following slight generalisation: any closed set in a compact space is compact. This should be easy with the usual definition of compactness (any cover admits a finite subcover). If you insist on working with metric spaces, it's even easier, using the definition that a set in a metric space is compact iff every sequence has a convergent subsequence.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Actually, this is not necessarily true for non-Hausdorff spaces. Take the line with two origins, and the two "intervals" corresponding to $[-1,1]$. $\endgroup$ – ronno Dec 6 '13 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ @ronno: Touche. I thought about a different formulation: intersection of a closed set and a compact set is compact, which is true in general. But of course in non-Hausdorff spaces a compact set need not be closed... $\endgroup$ – tomasz Dec 6 '13 at 12:37
0
$\begingroup$

$A$ is closed in $X$, so $A \cap B$ is closed in $B$. Now, a closed subset of a compact space is compact.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.