If $A\subseteq\mathbb N$ and $\sum\limits_{a\in A}\frac1a$ converges then $A$ has natural density $0$ In this answer to a question about a series, a theorem was stated:

If $A= \{a_i \}$ is a set such that $\sum_{i = 1}^{\infty} \frac{1}{a_i}$ converges, then $d(A) = 0$, where $d(A)$ is the natural density of the set.

My background in number theory is basically zero and all my attempts to prove this have been utterly unseccessful; would anyone please help me, or at least provide me with a hint to prove it? 
 A: Given a set $A = (\cup a_i) \subset N$ with positive lim-sup density, it is possible to partition $N$ into intervals on which $A$ has density $\geq d$.  If the intervals grow in size at a suitable rate (for this problem, exponential growth is enough), there will be a positive number $C>0$ such that on each interval, $\Sigma_{a \in A} 1/a \geq C$, and this makes the sum over all intervals infinite.
In more detail,


*

*There is a partition of the positive integers into intervals $[1,n_1], [n_1 + 1, n_2], [n_2 + 1,n_3], \dots$ such that the density of $A$ is at least $d > 0$ on each interval.  This can be done for any $d < L$ where $L$ is the lim sup density of $A$.   

*By joining together adjacent intervals, one can also require that the sequence $n_k$ grows fast enough that density in $[1,n_i]$ is not strongly affected by what happens in preceding intervals $[1,n_j]$ with $j < i$.  In particular, one can keep or remove the subinterval $[1,n_{i-1}]$ with small effect on density questions in $[1,n_i]$.    For this problem, fast enough growth will mean strictly exponential growth, i.e., $n_{i+1} / n_i > p $ for constant $p > 1$.

*The most efficient packing of a given number of integers into an interval $[m,n]$ (where efficiency means minimim sum of $1/a$ with $a$ ranging over the subset) is to place the whole subset as close as possible to $n$.  If the density is at least $d$, the number of integers to be placed is at least $d(n-m+1)$, and then $\Sigma 1/a$ is at least $d(n-m)/n = d(1-m/n)$.  

*For the exponentially growing intervals with $m/n < 1/p$ the sum in each interval of the partition of $N$ is bounded below by $C=d(1-1/p) > 0$, so the sum of all $1/a_i$ is infinite.  
A: Let $c_n = |A\cap [1,n]|$ and $S_n=\sum_{a\in A\cap [1,n]}\frac 1a$. Our hypothesis is that $S_n$ converges.
Let $S_0=0$.
Note that $$c_n = \sum_{k=1}^n 1_A(k)=\sum_{k=1}^n k\left(1_A(k)\frac 1k\right)=\sum_{k=1}^n k(S_k-S_{k-1}) = nS_n-\sum_{k=1}^{n-1}S_k$$
Thus $$\frac{c_n}n = S_n - \frac 1n \sum_{k=1}^{n-1}S_k$$
By Cesaro mean theorem, $\frac 1n \sum_{k=1}^{n-1}S_k$ converges to the same limit as $S_n$, hence $\lim_n \dfrac{c_n}n= 0$, which is what needed to be proved.
A: If the natural density of $A = \{a_i\}$ exists, then we can show that it must be zero.
Let $\displaystyle S_{n} = \frac{|A \cup [1,n]|}{n}$
Now $\displaystyle \{\frac{n}{a_n}\}$ is a subsequence of $S_{n}$ and so if the limit is $\displaystyle 2\delta > 0 $ then we have that for all $\displaystyle n > N_0$, $\displaystyle \frac{n}{a_n} > \delta$ and so $\displaystyle \frac{1}{a_n} > \frac{\delta}{n}$ for all $\displaystyle n > N_0$ and so $\displaystyle \sum \frac{1}{a_n}$ diverges.
The main problem is actually showing that the limit exists.
It is easy to show that $\liminf$ is zero: If the limit was $\displaystyle 2\delta > 0$ then for all $n > N_{0}$, $S_{n} > \delta$ and an argument similar to above works.
Now suppose $\displaystyle  \limsup S_n = 2\delta > 0$. Then there is a subsequence $\displaystyle S_{N_1}, S_{N_2}, ..., S_{N_k}, \dots $ which converges to $\displaystyle 2\delta$.
Now we can choose the subsequence so that $\displaystyle S_{N_i} > \delta$ and $\displaystyle  N_{k+1} > \frac{2N_{k}}{\delta}$
Now the number of elements of $\displaystyle  A$ in the interval $\displaystyle (N_{k}, N_{k+1}]$ is atleast $\displaystyle  \delta N_{k+1} - N_k \ge \delta N_{k+1} - \frac{\delta N_{k+1}}{2} \ge \frac{\delta N_{k+1}}{2}$ and so the sum of reciprocals in that interval is atleast $\displaystyle \frac{\delta N_{k+1}}{2} \frac{1}{N_{k+1}} =  \displaystyle \frac{\delta}{2}$
And so the sum of reciprocals must diverge.
Hence $\displaystyle \limsup S_n = 0 = \liminf S_n$ and thus $\displaystyle \lim S_n = 0$ and thus the natural density is zero.
