I'm trying to understand the construction of the dirac operator on a manifold, but actually I guess that doesn't really matter for the question at stake. I'm interested in understanding a definition of the principal symbol. Specifically, In Lawson and Michelsohn's Spin Geometry page 113 it says:

Recall that the principal symbol of a differential operator $D:\Gamma (E) \to \Gamma (E)$ is a map which associates to each point $x \in X $ and each cotangent vector $\xi \in T^*_x(X)$, a linear map $\sigma _{\xi}(D):E_x \to E_x$ defined as follows. If in local coordinates we have $$ D=\sum_{|\alpha|\leq m}A_{\alpha}(x)\frac{\partial ^{|\alpha|}}{\partial x^{\alpha}} \text{ and } \xi=\sum_k \xi_k dx_k$$ where m is the order of $D$, then $$\sigma_{\xi}(D) = i^m \sum_{|\alpha|= m} A_{\alpha}(x)\xi^{\alpha}.$$

After going to the some other chapter you find out that $E$ is a complex vector bundle over $X$, a riemannian manifold, with a local trivialization $E|_U\to U \times \mathbb{C}^q$ and $A_{\alpha}(x)$ is a $q\times q$-matrix of smooth complex-valued functions.

So the question I have is if one is working with real vector bundles how does one define the principal symbol. I mean, if now one has that $A_{\alpha}(x)$ is a $q\times q$-matrix of smooth real-valued functions, how do you define the linear map $\sigma _{\xi}(D):E_x \to E_x$, because just taking the "$i^m$" factor off from the definition seems quite arbitrary. Any clarification is highly appreciated!


Let $E\rightarrow M$ and $F\rightarrow M$ be vector bundles with spaces $\Gamma(E)$ and $\Gamma(F)$ of smooth sections. Consider a linear partial differential operator of order $k$, which is a map \begin{align} L=\sum_{|\alpha|\leq k}\ell_\alpha\partial^\alpha:\Gamma(E)&\rightarrow\Gamma(F)\\ S&\mapsto L(S)=\sum_{|\alpha|\leq k}\ell_\alpha\partial^\alpha S. \end{align} Here $\alpha=(\alpha_1,...,\alpha_m)$ is a multi-index and each $\ell_\alpha:E\rightarrow F$ is a bundle homomorphism. Now let $\omega=\omega_i\text{d}x^i\in\Gamma(T^*M)$ be a covector field (a $1$-form). The total symbol of a linear partial differential operator $L$ in the direction of the covector field $\omega$ is the bundle homomorphism: \begin{align} \sigma_L(\omega)=\sum_{|\alpha|\leq k}\omega^\alpha\ell_\alpha:E&\rightarrow F\\ e&\mapsto\sigma_L(\omega)e=\sum_{|\alpha|\leq k}\omega^\alpha\ell_\alpha e. \end{align} Here $\omega^\alpha=\omega_1^{\alpha_1}\cdots\omega_m^{\alpha_m}$. The principal symbol simply takes the highest-order partial derivative terms of the symbol, and is the bundle homomorphism: \begin{align} \hat{\sigma}_L(\omega)=\sum_{|\alpha|=k}\omega^\alpha\ell_\alpha:E&\rightarrow F\\ e&\mapsto\hat{\sigma}_L(\omega)e=\sum_{|\alpha|=k}\omega^\alpha\ell_\alpha e. \end{align} Hence, the principal symbol captures the properties of the linear partial differential operator which are held in the highest-order partial derivative terms. A linear partial differential operator is elliptic if it's principal symbol is a linear-space isomorphism for all nonzero covector fields $\omega\neq0\in\Gamma(T^*M)$.

These notions also hold for nonlinear partial differential operators between spaces of sections of vector bundles, by considering the operator's linearisation. The linearisation of a nonlinear partial differential operator is a linear partial differential operator. The symbol (principal symbol) of a nonlinear partial differential operator is the symbol (principal symbol) of its linearisation. A nonlinear partial differential operator is elliptic if the principal symbol of its linearisation is a linear space ismorphism for all nonzero covector fields $\omega\neq0\in\Gamma(T^*M)$.


The principle symbol arise naturally when you take the Fourier transform, where the symbol appears the top order multiplier. So the choice of including $i$ is immaterial since then $i^{m}$ is a constant. The important thing is the property of $\sigma(D)$ (like whether it is elliptic, hyperbolic, invertible, etc), and that would not be changed by multiplying a constant.

I do not have Spin geometry with me, but I think what you wrote is incorrect. Here the $\sigma(D)$ should only include the top order term $|\alpha|=m$. What you wrote is the definition of the symbol instead.

  • $\begingroup$ yeah you're right, there's a typo, the definition of $\sigma(D)$ is as you say. I'll edit it. Thanks for the answer,at the end I came to a similar conclusion! $\endgroup$ Mar 11 '14 at 12:24
  • $\begingroup$ if $U\subset M$ why we say $\left. E \right|_{U}\simeq U\times \mathbb{C}^p$ if $U\nsubseteq E$, the correct not would be $\left. E \right|_{\pi^{-1}(U)}\simeq U\times \mathbb{C}^p$ ... or is a simplifaction of notation on the books that is implicited. thanks $\endgroup$
    – user89940
    Jan 13 '21 at 11:37

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.