0
$\begingroup$

Shpere

First of all, I take the surface patch for sphere

$$\sigma(u,v)=(\sin u\cos v, \sin u\sin v, \cos u)$$

And then I calculated its second fundametal form. And I got the following result

$$ -du^2-\sin^2 u \ dv^2$$

Second of all, I take different surface patch for the sphere.

$$\sigma(u,v)=\cos u\sin v, \sin u\sin v, \cos v)$$

And again I calculated the second fundamental form for it.

I obtained that $$ \sin^2 v du^2+ dv^2$$


The second fundamental forms are different since the surface patches are different. However, my instructor says that although the results are different, in fact, they are not completely different.

I think its reason. But I cannot find. Please explains why they are not completely different? Thanks a lot.

$\endgroup$
1
  • $\begingroup$ Mathematically the question is "how does the 2nd fundamental form transform under reparametrization of the surface?" This boils down to a chain rule computation. Please check Zhang's answer below. $\endgroup$
    – Avitus
    Dec 2, 2013 at 14:05

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

The second fundamental form has different forms in different coordinate representations, but they are essentially the same. It's just like a linear operator has different matrix representations in different set of basis. For example, if we transform $(u,v)$ representation to $(x,y)$ presentation, we obtain $$\begin{align}II(u,v)&=Ldu^2+2Mdudv+Ndv^2=L'dx^2+2M'dxdy+N'dy^2\end{align}$$ where $L', M', N'$ can be obtained by chain rule $$du=\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}dx+\frac{\partial u}{\partial y}dy\\ dv=\frac{\partial v}{\partial x}dx+\frac{\partial v}{\partial y}dy$$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.