3
$\begingroup$

I am working through Category for Scientists and am having trouble with the following question:

Let $A$ and $B$ be the sets defined by $A := \{a, 7, Q\}$ and $B := \{r8, "Bob", \clubsuit\}$. Note that the sets $A$ and $B$ are isomorphic. Supposing that $f : B \rightarrow \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$ sends "Bob" to 1, sends $\clubsuit$ to 3, and sends $r8$ to 4, is there a canonical function $A \rightarrow \{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$ corresponding to $f$?

I'm not entirely certain what the question is asking. What do "canonical function" and "corresponding to $f$" mean?

|cite|improve this question
$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Its basically saying: okay, there are many functions $A \rightarrow B$, is there any such function that deserves to be considered special? If there was such a special entity $g : A \rightarrow B$, then from the function $f : B \rightarrow (*)$ given, we can obtain a new function $f' : A \rightarrow (*)$ in a "canonical" way, by defining $f' = f \circ g$. However, since there is really no entity $g : A \rightarrow B$ that is in any way special relative to the others, thus there is no "canonical" way obtaining a function $f' : A \rightarrow (*)$ from the given function $f : B \rightarrow (*)$. $\endgroup$ – goblin Dec 30 '13 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ By the way, this is why category theorists we tend not to identify isomorphic objects. On the other hand, if we're given objects $A$ and $B$ such that there exists a unique isomorphism $f : A \rightarrow B$, then it is sensible to identify $A$ and $B$. $\endgroup$ – goblin Dec 30 '13 at 14:54
5
$\begingroup$

The point of the question is to highlight the fact that though $A$ and $B$ are isomorphic, there is no "obvious" or "canonical" or "natural" isomorphism between them.

If you have a function $f : B \to \{1,2,3,4,5\}$, you can "translate" it to a function $A \to \{1,2,3,4,5\}$ by composing it with a suitable bijection (isomorphism) between $A$ and $B$. So the answer is no, from the previous paragraph.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ +1 Apparently I misread the question to mean "find a canonical function". Thank you for the clarification. $\endgroup$ – Code-Guru Dec 30 '13 at 20:58
0
$\begingroup$

Just wanted to add that you should also look at the note at the bottom of the 21st page:

Canonical means something like “best choice”, a choice that stands out as the only reasonable one.

|cite|improve this answer
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks. It has been a long time since I posted this. If I recall correctly, my confusion was because there is no obvious "best choice" among the 6 possible bijections from $A$ to $B$. $\endgroup$ – Code-Guru Dec 26 '17 at 15:40
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Your question is still relevant! You must be a category theory master by now but other people who read this book might be confused by the term. $\endgroup$ – Danny Mor Dec 27 '17 at 8:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.