2
$\begingroup$

Suppose $d_{1}(x,y) = |x-y|$, $d_{2}(x, y) = |\phi(x) - \phi(y)|$, where $\phi(x) = \frac{x}{1 + |x|}$. Prove that $d_{1}$ and $d_{2}$ are metrics on $\mathbb{R}$ which induce the same topology.

It's easy to prove that $d_{1}$ and $d_{2}$ are metrics. Call the topologies induced by them $\tau_{1}$ and $\tau_{2}$. I can prove that $\tau_{1}$ is finer than $\tau_{2}$, but I can't prove the inverse. Can any body please help me. Thanks

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Consider the map $$\phi \colon \mathbb{R} \to (-1,1);\quad \phi(x) = \frac{x}{1+\lvert x\rvert}.$$ Show it is a homeomorphism. $\endgroup$ – Daniel Fischer Nov 24 '13 at 14:24
  • $\begingroup$ I can prove your map is a homeomorphism, and $d_{2}(x,y) = d(\phi(x), \phi(y))$, but then why $\tau_{2}$ is finer than $\tau_{1}$??? $\endgroup$ – le duc quang Nov 24 '13 at 14:39
3
$\begingroup$

Let's break it down like this:

  1. Given a metric space $(Y,d)$, a set $X$, and a bijection $f\colon X \to Y$, the pull-back of $d$ via $f$, $f^\ast d \colon X\times X \to [0,\infty);\; f^\ast d(a,b) = d(f(a),f(b))$ is a metric on $X$. Thus $f\colon (X,f^\ast d) \to (Y,d)$ is an isometry, in particular a homeomorphism.

  2. If, in the situation above, $X$ carries a prior topology $\tau$, we have two topologies on $X$, the original $\tau$, and the one induced by the pull-back of $d$, let's call it $\tau_{f^\ast d}$. We have $\tau = \tau_{f^\ast d}$ if and only if $\operatorname{id} \colon (X,\tau) \to (X,\tau_{f^\ast d})$ is a homeomorphism. Since the composition of homeomorphisms is a homeomorphism, and we know that $f \colon (X,\tau_{f^\ast d}) \to (Y,d)$ is a homeomorphism, that is the case if and only if $f\circ \operatorname{id} \colon (X,\tau) \to (Y,d)$ is a homeomorphism.

It remains to identify $X$, $Y$, $f$, $d$, $\tau$, $\tau_{f^\ast d}$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ perfect. Thanks so much Daniel. $\endgroup$ – le duc quang Nov 25 '13 at 1:23
0
$\begingroup$

Or you can show that if $d_1(x_n,x)\to 0<=>d_2(x_n,x)\to 0$. It is more easy sometimes to use convergance,besides topology was invented for convergance. To give you a hint i'll show the more easy part ($=>$).

Let $d_1(x_n,x)=|x_n-x|\to 0$ then $$d_2(x_n,x)=\frac {x_n}{1+|x_n|}-\frac {x}{1+|x|}=\frac {(x_n-x)+(|x|x_n-|x_n|x)}{(1+|x_n|)(1+|x|)}$$. We have that $|x_n-x|\to 0$ and $x_n\to x=>|x_n|\to |x|$ and thus $d_2(x_n,x)\to 0$. Your turn:)

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Can you explain why if $d_{1}(x_{n}, x) \rightarrow 0 <=> d_{2}(x_{n}, x) \rightarrow 0$, then 2 topologies are the same. This statement seems quite helpful in many case? Thanks $\endgroup$ – le duc quang Nov 25 '13 at 1:26
  • $\begingroup$ Yes $d1(x_n,x)→0<=>d2(x_n,x)→0$ which means that they produce the same open sets. to prove this,is not difficult but you need to write down some things( i cannot think any faster way),but think of it that they produce the same structure (this is algebraic term). Or each open set can be described equivalenlty by these two metrics. $\endgroup$ – Haha Nov 25 '13 at 10:11
  • $\begingroup$ I don't think it's right Dimitris. With your condition, I think we can only state that 2 topologies have the same Cauchy sequence, so if one is complete, then the other is complete, too. But how can they be the same? $\endgroup$ – le duc quang Nov 25 '13 at 12:23
  • $\begingroup$ No,it's quite right my friend:). Use it in these problems and you will remember me:) $\endgroup$ – Haha Nov 25 '13 at 22:17

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.