Let $\mathbb{R}$ be a topological space with topology consisting of the sets $A \cup B$, where $A$ is open in the usual topology, and $B \subseteq \mathbb{R} \setminus \mathbb{Q}$. Is the interval $[0,1]$ compact in this topology?

I think that it might be, as if we have an open cover of $[0,1]$ in this topology, the cover consists of open sets of the form $A \cup B$. $B$ is a set of irrational numbers in the interval $[0,1]$. We can always find an open interval in $[0,1]$ to cover each irrational number, since for any irrational $p \in [0,1]$ there are $a,b \in \mathbb{Q} \cap [0,1]$ such that $a < p < b$, and then $p \in (a,b)$. Therefore now we have an open cover entirely composed of sets from $A$. But we know closed intervals in the usual topology are compact, so then $[0,1]$ is compact in the $A \cup B$ topology.

Could you please tell me whether my argument is correct or not?

  • $\begingroup$ You need to show that any open cover of $[0,1]$ contains a finite cover. $\endgroup$
    – AlexR
    Nov 21, 2013 at 11:34
  • $\begingroup$ It looks strange because there is a subset that is not compact. In fact with this topology any irrational point is open (take $A=\emptyset$). So the set of irrational points has a cover from which we cannot extract a finite cover. $\endgroup$ Nov 21, 2013 at 11:53
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ The fact that you can always find an open interval containing any given irrational is irrelevant: it may be that no open interval containing that irrational belongs to your cover. $\endgroup$ Nov 21, 2013 at 13:41
  • $\begingroup$ @BrianM.Scott's comment is the only answer to the actual question. $\endgroup$
    – Carsten S
    Nov 22, 2013 at 12:27

3 Answers 3


It is not a compact space. Let $\pi_n$ be a positive increasing succession converging to an irrational number $p<1$. You had that $\{p\}=\emptyset \cup \{p\}$ is open in $[0,1]$. So in particular $X=\cup_{n>0} \{(0,\pi_{n})\} \cup \{[0,\pi_1),\{p\},(p,1]\}$ is an open cover, from where you cannot extract a finite one.


HINT: This is not a compact space anymore. In fact not even Lindelof. Take an $\varepsilon$ cover of the rational numbers, then generate from it a cover without a finite subcover. Indeed without a countable subcover.


I am sorry for not looking at your argument, but if $\tau_1$, $\tau_2$ are topologies on $X$, $\tau_2\supset\tau_1$, $(X,\tau_1)$ compact Hausdorff, then $(X,\tau_2)$ is compact if and only if $\tau_1=\tau_2$.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.