Let $M$ be a Noetherian $A$-module where $A$ is a commutative ring with identity. Let $I_1\leq I_2\leq\cdots$ be an ascending chain of ideals of $A$. Then $I_1M\leq I_2M\leq\cdots$ is an ascending chain of submodules of $M$. Since $M$ Noetherian, $I_1M\leq I_2M\leq\cdots$ terminates. Does this imply $I_1\leq I_2\leq\cdots$ terminates hence $A$ is Noetherian? Why am I wrong?

If we let $\text{Ann}{\ M}=\{a\in A\mid am=0 \text{ for any }m\in M\}\leq I_1\leq I_2\leq\cdots$ be an ascending chain of ideals of $A$, then why in this case, $I_1M\leq I_2M\leq\cdots$ terminates can imply $I_1\leq I_2\leq\cdots$ terminates hence $A/\text{Ann}(M)$ Noetherian?

I am confused. Thank you a lot!

  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Take $0$ module. $\endgroup$ – user52045 Nov 19 '13 at 2:52
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ To have this implication you need $I\subsetneq J$ iff $MI\subsetneq MJ$. This is only the case if $Ann(M)=O$. $\endgroup$ – user52045 Nov 19 '13 at 3:16
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Ren You can't prove in this way that $A/Ann(M)$ is noetherian. Anyway, it's easy to give examples of noetherian modules over a non-noetherian ring. $\endgroup$ – user89712 Nov 19 '13 at 8:05
  • $\begingroup$ Dear @user : I think you can show that $A/Ann(M)$ is Noetherian for a nonzero Noetherian $A$ module $M$. I would appreciate feedback if you think I've made a mistake in my solution. Thanks. $\endgroup$ – rschwieb Nov 19 '13 at 14:55

A counterexample

Let $R$ be your favorite commutative ring which isn't Noetherian, and let $I$ be any maximal ideal of it. Then $M=R/I$ is a simple (and so certainly Noetherian) module for this not-Noetherian ring.

Why am I wrong?

The wrong link is the idea that the chain of $I_iM$ stabilizing should imply that the chain of $I_i$ should stabilize. It just isn't so. In the example above, there are two cases that could occur. If $\cup I_i\subseteq I$, then $I_iM=\{0\}$ for all $i$, and this chain has certainly stabilized. On the other hand, if $\cup I_i\nsubseteq I$ then at some index $j$, $I_iM=M$ for all $i\geq j$, and the chain has again stabilized. But $I_i$ could be any nonstablizing chain in $R$ that you like.

The second part

As was mentioned in the comments, it's true that if $R$ has a faithful Noetherian module $M$, ($Ann(M)=\{0\}$) then $R$ is Noetherian. (The counterexample I gave is not a faithful $R$ module if $I\neq 0$.)

The idea of the proof is that since $M$ is finitely generated, you can inject $R$ into $M^n$ for some positive integer $n$. This makes $R$ a submodule of the Noetherian module $M^n$, hence $R$ is also Noetherian.

This particular fact has appeared in answers before. See especially these two: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/258141/29335 https://math.stackexchange.com/a/110219/29335

It can be checked that the $R/Ann(M)$ submodules of $M$ coincide with the $R$ submodules of $M$, so $M$ is a Noetherian $R/Ann(M)$ module, and moreover it is a faithful $R/Ann(M)$ module. By the above this means that $R/Ann(M)$ is in fact a Noetherian ring.

So that's why in the second part a chain based at $Ann(M)$ will in fact stabilize.

| cite | improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.