2
$\begingroup$

Let $\beta$ be a countable limit ordinal. Prove $\exists$ sequence $\left\langle{\alpha_n | n \in \omega}\right\rangle$ with the following properties:

$(1): \alpha_0 = 0\;;$
$ (2): \forall n \in \omega [\alpha_0 \in \beta, \alpha_n <\alpha_{n+1}]\;;$
$(3): \forall \epsilon < \beta\,\exists n \in \omega [\epsilon \leq \alpha_n]\;.$

Could anyone advise me on this problem? I'm totally clueless. The hint is to fix bijection $f: \omega \to \beta$ and define $ \alpha_n$ by induction. Could anyone explain why? Thank you.

$\endgroup$

2 Answers 2

4
$\begingroup$

Having such a bijection $f$, define a sequence $\langle i_n \rangle_{i \in \omega}$ as follows:

  • $i_0 = f^{-1} ( 0 )$;
  • $i_{n+1} = \min \{ i \in \omega : i > i_n , f ( i ) > f ( j )\text{ for all }j \leq i_n \}$.

Since $\beta$ is a limit ordinal it is possible to find such a sequence. Note that it is strictly increasing.

Given $\epsilon < \beta$, since $f^{-1} ( \epsilon ) = k < \omega$, it follows that $i_{k} \geq k$, and therefore $f ( i_{k+1} ) > f ( k ) = \epsilon$.

We then define $\alpha_n = f ( i_n )$.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Thank you for the great instruction! I'm afraid I still can't understand why it is necessary for $\beta$ to be LIMIT ordinal. $\endgroup$ Nov 14, 2013 at 9:16
  • $\begingroup$ @AlexyVincenzo: If $\beta$ where a successor ordinal $\beta = \gamma + 1$, if $\langle \alpha_n \rangle_{n \in \omega}$ were cofinal in $\beta$, this would mean that $\alpha_n = \gamma$ for some $n < \omega$. But then it is impossible for $\alpha_{n+1}$ to be strictly greater than $\alpha_n$. $\endgroup$
    – user642796
    Nov 14, 2013 at 9:23
4
$\begingroup$

You’re being asked to construct a strictly increasing sequence whose limit (supremum) is $\beta$. Let $f:\omega\to\beta$ be a bijection; there is one, because $\beta$ is a countable limit ordinal. Moreover, you may assume that $f(0)=0$: if $f(0)=n>0$ and $f(k)=0$, just switch the values of $f(0)$ and $f(k)$. Now let $\alpha_0=f(0)$. Given $\alpha_n$, let $$\alpha_{n+1}=f\big(\min\{k\in\omega:f(k)>\alpha_n\}\big)\;.$$ This certainly ensures that $\langle\alpha_n:n\in\omega\rangle$ is a strictly increasing sequence of ordinals less than $\beta$. You still have to show that $\sup_n\alpha_n=\beta$, and I’ll leave that for you to try.

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .