2
$\begingroup$

Assume that a sequence $(f_n)$ of functions $f_n:[0,1] \rightarrow \mathbb R$ is uniformly convergent to a function $f:[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb R$. Moreover let (for each $n\in \mathbb N$) $f_n$ be bounded and $f_n$ be a derivative of some $F_n: [0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb R$.

How to show that $f$ is a derivative of some $F:[0,1]\rightarrow \mathbb R$?

My attempt: by assumptions follows easily that $f_n$ (as derivative) is measurable , consequently (as measurable and bounded) $f_n$ is integrable. Hence $F_n$ is absolutely continuous. We have also that $f$ is integrable and bounded (as a consequence of uniformly convergence). Let $$G_n(x)= \int_0^xf_n(t)dt.$$ Then (using definition of uniform convergence) $$\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} G_n(x)= \int_0^x f(t)dt=:G(x) \textrm{ for } x\in [0,1].$$

I'm not sure whether $G'(x)=f(x)$ for all $x∈[0,1]$., because I know only that absolutely continuous function has derivatives almost everywhere.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Because of uniform convergance we have that $f$ is continuous on $[0,1]$. $f_n$ are bounded because $[0,1]$ is compact. So $f$ as continuous on the compact $[0,1]$ is bounded and thus is integrable $\endgroup$ – Haha Nov 7 '13 at 15:22
  • $\begingroup$ @L.T, I believe some background regarding your level of familiarity with calculus/integration-theory will be very helpful in tailoring the answer to your needs. $\endgroup$ – Jonathan Y. Nov 7 '13 at 15:23
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ @Dimitris Why $f$ is continuous? Derivative of function has only the Darboux property. $\endgroup$ – A.B Nov 7 '13 at 15:23
  • $\begingroup$ correct.i just assumed that $f_n$ are continuous $\endgroup$ – Haha Nov 7 '13 at 17:36
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @L.T: Hint: you may imitate the proof of that uniform convergence limit of continuous functions is continuous to show $G'=f$. If you need me to elaborate, could you please add the content in your first comment to the body of your question? It would be helpful for me/others to answer your question in details. $\endgroup$ – Hu Zhengtang Nov 7 '13 at 19:13
2
$\begingroup$

To show that $G'(x) = f(x)$ for an $x \in [0,1]$, we must, for every $\varepsilon > 0$, find (establish the existence of) a $\delta > 0$ such that

$$0 <\lvert h\rvert < \delta \land (x+h)\in[0,1] \Rightarrow \left\lvert \frac{G(x+h)-G(x)}{h} - f(x)\right\rvert < \varepsilon.$$

Let $\varepsilon > 0$ be arbitrary. By the uniform convergence of $f_n \to f$, choose an $N\in \mathbb{N}$ such that $\lvert f_N(y) - f(y)\rvert < \varepsilon/3$ for all $y \in [0,1]$. For that $N$, by the assumed differentiability of $F_N$ in $x$, choose $\delta > 0$ such that

$$0 <\lvert h\rvert < \delta \land (x+h)\in[0,1] \Rightarrow \left\lvert \frac{F_N(x+h)-F_N(x)}{h} - f_N(x)\right\rvert < \varepsilon/3.$$

Then, for admissible $h$, we have

$$\begin{align} \left\lvert \frac{G(x+h)-G(x)}{h} - f(x)\right\rvert &= \left\lvert \frac1h \int_0^h f(x+t)\,dt - f(x) \right\rvert\\ &= \Biggl\lvert \frac1h \int_0^h \bigl(f(x+t) - f_N(x+t)\bigr)\,dt\\ &\qquad + \left(\frac1h \int_0^h f_N(x+t)\,dt - f_N(x)\right)\\ &\qquad + \bigl(f_N(x) -f(x)\bigr)\Biggr\rvert\\ &\leqslant \frac1{\lvert h\rvert} \int_0^{\lvert h\rvert} \lvert f(x+ \sigma(h)t)-f_N(x+\sigma(h)t)\rvert\,dt\tag{*}\\ &\qquad + \left \lvert\frac{F_N(x+h)-F_N(x)}{h} -f_N(x)\right\rvert\\ &\qquad + \lvert f_N(x) - f(x)\rvert\\ &< \frac{\varepsilon}{3} + \frac{\varepsilon}{3} + \frac{\varepsilon}{3}, \end{align}$$

so we see that $G$ is differentiable in $x$ with derivative $G'(x) = f(x)$.

In $(*)$, $\sigma(h)$ is the sign of $h$, $\pm 1$.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Many thanks for answer!!! $\endgroup$ – A.B Nov 7 '13 at 20:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.