How to prove, when $f(A) \subseteq f(B)$ doesn't "always" mean that $$A \subseteq B$$
when $ f\colon X \to Y $ is total function (not partial)
Mathematics Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people studying math at any level and professionals in related fields. It only takes a minute to sign up.
Sign up to join this communityHow to prove, when $f(A) \subseteq f(B)$ doesn't "always" mean that $$A \subseteq B$$
when $ f\colon X \to Y $ is total function (not partial)
take $f$ to be a real valued constant function defined on the set of all real numbers, ie $f(x) = 1$ for all real $x$. then the relation $f(A) \subset f(B)$ is always satisfied
To prove that an implication isn't true, i.e., that it doesn't always hold, we need only exhibit a counterexample (or example showing when the implication is false).
Consider the function $f(x) = x^2$, $A = \mathbb R,\; B= \mathbb R_{\geq 0}$.
$f(A) = f(B),$ but $A \not\subseteq B$.
Consider $f: \mathbb R \to \mathbb R^+, x\mapsto x^2$ And then see $$f([0, 2]) = f([-2, 0])$$
Take $X=\{1,2\}$, $Y=\{y\}$ and $f(1)=f(2)=y$ (no ambiguity). Then $f(\{1\})=f(\{2\})=Y$.
Just consider the map $f:\mathbb{R}\rightarrow \left\{0\right\}$, and any two disjoint stes in $\mathbb{R}$. For example, consider $I=\left[0,1\right]$ and $J=\left[-1,0\right)$. Clearly $I\cap J=\emptyset$ and $f(I)=\left\{0\right\}\subseteq f(J)=\left\{0\right\}$. Hence, $f$, $I$, and $J$ are a counterexample for the given proof.