0
$\begingroup$

i have this from Hatcher's book "Algebric topology"

enter image description here

And i don't understand why $\displaystyle \partial P(\sigma)=\sum_{j\leq i}(-1)^i(-1)^j F\circ (\sigma\times id)|[v_0,...,\widehat{v}_j,...,w_i,...,w_n]+\sum_{j\geq i}(-1)^i(-1)^{j+1} F\circ (\sigma\times id)|[v_0,...,v_i,\widehat{w}_j,...,w_n]$

Plese.

Thank you.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Have you tried to see why this might be the case for low values of $n$? $\endgroup$ – Dan Rust Oct 31 '13 at 17:04
  • $\begingroup$ no , but my question is how to calculat $\partial P(\sigma)$ $\endgroup$ – Vrouvrou Oct 31 '13 at 17:52
  • $\begingroup$ @DanielRust please why ${i-1}$ in $P\partial(\sigma)$ please $\endgroup$ – Vrouvrou Aug 25 '14 at 15:22
1
$\begingroup$

He's just applying the definition and splitting it over two pieces. The first sum is the contribution from the v components (from $\Delta^n$), and the second is running over (is the contribution from) the w components (from I).

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ but why there is (-1)^j when $j\leq i$ and $(-1)^{j+1}$when $j\geq i$ ??? $\endgroup$ – Vrouvrou Nov 1 '13 at 7:52
  • $\begingroup$ @Vrouvrou Carefully check the position that they're in. In particular, look at your definition of $P(\sigma)$ and note how there are two $i$ indices in a row. $\endgroup$ – zibadawa timmy Nov 4 '13 at 5:39
  • $\begingroup$ please why we have $t-1$ and why strict inequality between $t$ and $j$ in $P\partial(\sigma)=\sum_{t<j} (-1)^t(-1)^j F\circ (\sigma\times id)[v_0,...,v_t,w_t,...,\widehat{w_j},...,w_n]+\sum_{t>j}(-1)^{t-1}(-1)^j F\circ(\sigma\times id)[v_0,...,\widehat{v_j},...,v_t,w_t,...,w_n]$ $\endgroup$ – Vrouvrou Aug 25 '14 at 15:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.