The translation theorem of Galois theory (as I learned it) roughly states that two Galois extensions $L,K$ of a ground field $k$ that are "far enough" (i.e. $L \cap K = k$) inside the same algebraic closure $\bar k$ of $k$ give rise to an extension $M = LK$ (the field compositum) of $k$ having both, $L$ and $K$ as subextensions with Galois group

$$Gal(M/k) = Gal(L/k) \times Gal(K/k)$$

(I know that there are some generalisations that not both extensions have to be Galois and that the Galois group $Gal(L/k)$ is isomorphic to the Galois group $Gal(M/L)$ but that should not play a role for my question)

Is there a converse statement to the translation theorem of Galois theory?

I'm thinking of a statement that whenever one can express the Galois group $H$ of an extension $M$ over a field $k$ as a direct product of groups, then those groups have to be Galois groups of certain extensions of $k$ and one can realize them? Or is this just what normal Galois theory gives?

EDIT And if we start from a Galois extension $M$ over $L \supseteq k$, under which conditions do we get a Galois extension $M'$ over $k$ which has the same Galois group $Gal(M'/k) \cong Gal(M/L)$

Thank you :-)

  • $\begingroup$ Do you mean $L \cap K = k$? $\endgroup$
    – JSchlather
    Oct 28, 2013 at 17:45
  • $\begingroup$ Yes thank you :-) $\endgroup$
    – BIS HD
    Oct 28, 2013 at 17:46
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ If $G=H_1\times H_2$ where $G=Gal(F/k)$ then the fixed fields $K_1,K_2$ of $H_1$ and $H_2$ are normal (the subgroups being normal) with Galois groups over $k$ $H_2$ and $H_1$, and Galois correspondence gives $K_1\cap K_2=k$, $K_1K_2=F$. I.e. no rocket science :) $\endgroup$
    – user8268
    Oct 28, 2013 at 17:59
  • $\begingroup$ @user8268 Thank you, feel free to post that as an answer ;-) I added a second question to the same theorem. Maybe you could have a look?? $\endgroup$
    – BIS HD
    Oct 28, 2013 at 18:52

1 Answer 1


As user8268 pointed out: If the Galois group $G$ of a Galois extension $F/k$ is the direct product $$G = H_1 \times H_2$$ of two normal subgroups, then the main theorem of Galois theory is the converse of the translation theorem I've looked for: Each fixed field $K_i = F^{H_i}$ has $Gal(K_i / F) = H_i$ for $i = 1,2$ and the compositum equals $F = K_1 K_2$.

My second question can be answered in the following way: If the group $Gal(L/k)$ acts on $Gal(M/L)$ trivially and $M/k$ is Galois, then we can write $$Gal(M/k) = Gal(M/L) \times Gal(L/k)$$ and the above statement gives a Galois extension $M'/k$ with Galois group $Gal(M'/k) = Gal(M/L)$. The trivial action could come from (different) prime group orders.

Thank you for your comments :-) That helped me a lot!


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.