1
$\begingroup$

Ok, so looking through some questions I've found this answer: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/1667/102636 containing proof, that there are either inifinitely or no local extrema of continous and nowhere differentiable function. I would love for someone to explain it to me in greater detail (I can't comment on this answer unfortunatelly...)

For recall, the proof goes like this:

Let's take $f:[a,b] -> R$ - continous and nowhere differentiable. Let's assume, $f$ has finite number of extrema, namly $c_1 < c_2 < .... < c_n$.

Now let's take some $c_i$ and $c_{i+1}$. We take $c$ - global maximum of $f$ on $[c_i, c_{i+1}]$ which occurs at an interior point. Therefore $c$ is local extrema of $f$.

I don't see why this global extremum on $[c_i, c_{i+1}]$ needs to be an interior point.

If someone could explain this to me I'd be really gratefull.

$\endgroup$
1
$\begingroup$

I think the answer was hastily written, and in particular "$c_1 < c_2<\dots f(c_2)$" needs to be fixed. Hopefully someone with commenting privilege will draw Akhil's attention to this.

Here is another way to phrase it. It is a theorem of Lebesgue that a function that is monotone on $[c,D]$ is differentiable at almost every point of $(c,d)$. Without getting into the technical meaning of "almost every", let's just say that the theorem guarantees $f$ to be differentiable at some point of $(c,d)$. Therefore, a nowhere differentiable function cannot be monotone on any subinterval of its domain.

If such a function had finitely many local extrema, there would be an interval $(c,d)\subset [a,b]$ on which it has no local extrema (you can order all extrema and pick an interval between two consecutive ones). On such an interval $f$ is monotone (this takes a proof), which contradicts the above.

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks, this helps a lot :) I took calculus classes a while ago and forgot a lot. I can see that $f$ is monotone, I just need to formalize it ;) $\endgroup$ – warran Oct 29 '13 at 2:55
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I thought that it was a theorem that if $f \colon \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}$ is continuous and nowhere monotone then the sets of points $x$ such that $f(x)$ attains a local maximum is dense in $\mathbb{R}$. So I don't see how you can have "no local extrema"! $\endgroup$ – Student Aug 1 '14 at 12:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.