0
$\begingroup$

Let $\mathbb{F}^{m \times n}$ be the vector space of all $m \times n$ matrices and let $\mathcal{L}(V, W)$ be the vector space of all linear maps from a vector space $V$ to a vector space $W$ ($V$ and $W$ both over $\mathbb{F}$) with $\dim V = n$, $\dim W = m$. Is $M_{B_V, B_W}: \mathcal{L}(V, W) \rightarrow \mathbb{F}^{m \times n}$ an isomorphism for each choice of bases $B_V$ of $V$ and $B_W$ of $W$?

EDIT: Sorry if this question did not seem motivated - my main reason for asking is that I am confused by matrices in $\mathbb{F}^{m \times n}$ whose entries are all the same or in which there is a repetition of columns: in other words, how can such a map be surjective? How can an $a_{ij} \in \mathbb{F}^{m \times n}$ whose entries are all the same or in which there is a repetition of columns correspond to $B_V$ and $B_W$?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ Yes, yes it is. If you'd like more details, you should begin by adding more details to your question. In particular, check out the information here about How to ask a good question. $\endgroup$ – Michael Albanese Oct 21 '13 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ Yes. ${}{}{}{}{}$ $\endgroup$ – copper.hat Oct 21 '13 at 5:11
  • $\begingroup$ @MichaelAlbanese: Thanks for the advice - I edited my question. I will make sure to take a look at that guide you linked me! $\endgroup$ – user102237 Oct 21 '13 at 5:37
1
$\begingroup$

$\mathcal{L}(V, W)$ is the set of all linear maps $V \to W$, they need not be injective or surjective. The map $M_{B_VB_W}$ takes a linear map $\varphi : V \to W$ and associates to it the unique matrix $A_{\varphi} \in \mathbb{F}^{m\times n}$ such that $[\varphi(v)]_{B_W} = A_{\varphi}[v]_{B_V}$; here $[\,\cdot\,]_{B_W}$ and $[\,\cdot\,]_{B_V}$ mean the components with respect to the bases $B_W$ and $B_V$ respectively. That is, $M_{B_VB_W}(\varphi) = A_{\varphi}$. If the matrix $A_{\varphi}$ has repeated columns, that just means the map $\varphi$ is not injective.

| cite | improve this answer | |
$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I understand this - I am not talking about the maps in $\mathcal{L}(V, W)$. I am talking about the map $M_{B_V,B_W}$ $\endgroup$ – user102237 Oct 21 '13 at 5:47
  • $\begingroup$ Okay...this makes wonderful sense. I should have known that this is exactly what you meant in your original answer. Thanks! $\endgroup$ – user102237 Oct 21 '13 at 5:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.