0
$\begingroup$

Let $f$ and $g$ be defined on $(a,\infty)$ and suppose $\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(f)=L$ and $\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(g)=\infty$. Prove that $\displaystyle\lim_{x\rightarrow\infty}(f\circ g)=L$.

I am having trouble proving this using $\epsilon-\delta$ definition. Any alternatives? Or how can it be proved using the epsilon-delta definition?

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Do you know the definition? $\endgroup$ – Git Gud Oct 20 '13 at 15:53
1
$\begingroup$

We know that $\lim_{x \to \infty}f(x) = L$ by definition means that for any $\varepsilon > 0$ there exists an $N$, such that $$x > N\implies |f(x) -L|<\varepsilon, \tag{1}$$ and also that since $\lim_{x \to \infty}g(x) = \infty$, by definition for any $O$ there exists an $M$ such that $$x > M \implies g(x)>O. \tag{2}$$

Now we need to show using these definitions that $\lim_{x \to \infty}f(g(x)) = L$. This just means showing that for any $\varepsilon>0$ there exists a $P$ such that $$x>P\implies|f(g(x))-L|<\varepsilon. \tag{3}$$

Since we have the liberty to choose any $O$ we want (the definition guarantees that for any $O$ an $M$ exists), just choose $O = N$. Then $(2)$ tells us that there exists some $M$ such that $x > M \implies g(x) > N$. But then our definition of the limit as $x$ approaches infinity of $f$ tells us that $g(x) > N \implies |f(g(x)) - L| < \varepsilon.$ And now we're done! For any $\varepsilon > 0$ there is an $M$ such that $$x>M\implies g(x) > N \implies |f(g(x))-L|<\varepsilon.$$ I've added the middle step $(g(x) > N)$ for clarity, but if you take it out then you can clearly see that this chain of statements is just a restatement of $(3)$, so our proof is complete. $\square$

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.