Mathematically-oriented sculptors have created three dimensional representations of higher dimensional polytopes; for example George Hart. The 5-dimensional polytope $CQHRL_5$ is described in this question and is diagrammed below (where same-labeled vertices are actually the same vertex).
A realization of $CQHRL_5$ has the following vertices and facets, where the facets are given by f ◦ x = 1:
Vertices:
-5: (2, 4, 5, 8, 11)
-4: (2, 4, 6, 8, 11)
-3: (2, 4, 6, 9, 12)
-2: (2, 5, 6, 9, 12)
-1: (3, 6, 8, 12, 16)
0: (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
1: (1, 3, 4, 6, 8)
2: (2, 3, 4, 6, 8)
3: (2, 4, 5, 7, 10)
4: (2, 4, 5, 8, 10)
Facets:
1: (0, -1, 1, 0, 0)
2: (0, 1, 0, 1, -1)
3: (0, 1, 1, -1, 0)
4: (-1, 0, 0, -1, 1)
5: (-1, 0, -1, 1, 0)
6: (-1, 0, 1, 1, -1)
7: (1, 1, -1, 0, 0)
8: (1, 1, 1, 0, -1)
9: (1, -1, 0, -1, 1)
10: (1, -1, -1, 1, 0)
11: (1, -1, 1, 1, -1)
12: (1, -1, -1, 1, 0)
$CQHRL_5$ has five quadrilateral faces, each of which intersect each of the other four quadrilateral faces at a vertex. Is it possible to construct a three dimensional model of $CQHRL_5$ including only the quadrilateral faces (i.e., preserving the ten vertices of intersection)? Is it possible if some or all of the quadrilaterals are non-convex?
Note: A related question of whether a 3-d representation of $CQHRL_5$ could be constructed from 5 (genus 0) curved surfaces each intersecting each other at one vertex each, is answered in the affirmative. If you have five crosses made of string with appropriately numbered ends, it is a straightforward job to connect the corresponding ends together. So, the question asked above is a geometry question, not a topology question.