1
$\begingroup$

In this article in page 3:

http://arxiv.org/pdf/0904.1332.pdf

says:

If I consider $\Omega$ a open bounded and convex set, then the function $\delta (x) = \displaystyle\min_{y \in \partial \Omega } |x-y|$ ($x \in \Omega$) is p - superharmonic with $p >1$.

Someone know if the function $\theta (x) = d (x ,A)$ ($x \in \Omega - A$) (d denotes the set distance) where $A \subset \Omega$ with $\overline{A} \subset \Omega$ is p-superharmonic in the weak sense in $\Omega - A$(p>1) ?

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ I am doing this question beacause if the answer is "yes" then I understand a affirmation in a proof of a theorem that I am studying $\endgroup$ – math student Oct 11 '13 at 1:24
  • $\begingroup$ What is the relation of your question with the paper you have cited? $\endgroup$ – Tomás Oct 11 '13 at 1:37
  • $\begingroup$ Are you asking whether $\theta$ is p-harmonic, or p-superharmonic? And do you have a link to the proof you are studying? $\endgroup$ – Anthony Carapetis Oct 11 '13 at 2:19
  • $\begingroup$ @Tomás . Eu citei o paper pois é meio que razoavel de se esperar que a funcao $\theta$ satisaça o que eu escrevi. No paper que estou lendo parece que o autor usa ( e nem menciona) que $\theta$ satisfaz o que escrevi na questao $\endgroup$ – math student Oct 11 '13 at 3:22
  • $\begingroup$ For $p=2$ at least it seems the convexity of $A$ is necessary: jstor.org/stable/2045528. Since distance functions have unit gradient almost everywhere it feels like $p$ should not be too relevant - certainly in the smooth case harmonicity and $p$-harmonicity are equivalent when $|\nabla \theta| = 1$. I'm unsure if the weak case differs. $\endgroup$ – Anthony Carapetis Oct 11 '13 at 3:31
0
$\begingroup$

Let $\Omega\subset\mathbb{R}^N$, $N\geq 2$, be an open set containing the origin and $A=\{0\}$. Consider the function $$u(x)=\operatorname{d}(x,A)=\|x\|$$

Note that $u$ is subharmonic for every open set in $\mathbb{R}^N$ not containing the origin, hence, $u$ is weakly subharmonic in every open set not containing the origin. This implies that for any $\varphi\geq 0$ such that $\varphi\in C_0^\infty(U)$, with $U$ open and $\overline{U}\subset\Omega\setminus A$, we have that $$\int_{\Omega\setminus A} \nabla u\cdot\nabla\varphi dx=\int_U\nabla u\cdot\nabla\varphi\geq 0$$

Therefore the function $u$ cannot be weakly superharmonic in $\Omega\setminus A$, however, is its weakly subharmonic.

$\endgroup$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.