2
$\begingroup$

Let $G$ be a group and let $G'$ denotes its commutator subgroup, that is the group generated by all elements of the form $g^{-1}h^{-1}gh$. Is the following true:

If $G/G'$ is cyclic, then G is abelian.

Recall that the claim is true for the $G$ modulo the center of $G$. See If $G/Z(G)$ is cyclic, then $G$ is abelian

$\endgroup$
  • $\begingroup$ but my problem is if G/G′ is cyclic then G is abelian. so my prove is incorrect?, $\endgroup$ – Rachel Oct 9 '13 at 18:51
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ No. The statement is not correct, so your proof is also not correct. $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Oct 9 '13 at 18:54
  • $\begingroup$ but the exercise is not correct ? $\endgroup$ – Rachel Oct 9 '13 at 18:59
  • 3
    $\begingroup$ If the exercise asks you to prove this, then no, it is not correct. Take the smallest non-abelian group to get an example of why. $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Oct 9 '13 at 19:00
  • $\begingroup$ (For why your proof fails, you change the order of $z$ and $x^b$ at some point with no mention of why that would be allowed, and then you do the same with $z$ and $w$). $\endgroup$ – Tobias Kildetoft Oct 10 '13 at 6:29
7
$\begingroup$

The fact is that in general the question is false, but if one add the hypothesis, that the group $G$ is nilpotent (e.g. a $p$-group for some prime $p$), then the result become true:

Indeed, we have the chain $\gamma_{3}(G)\subset \gamma_{2}(G)\subset G$, where $\gamma_{2}(G)= G'$ and $\gamma_{3}(G)=[\gamma_{2}(G), G]$ (the commutator). Now from the last relation we have $\frac{\gamma_{2}(G)}{\gamma_{3}(G)}=Z( \frac{G}{\gamma_{3}(G)} ) $ (the center); so the quotient $\frac{\frac{G}{\gamma_{3}(G)}}{Z( \frac{G}{\gamma_{3}(G)} ) }=\frac{G}{\gamma_{2}(G)}$ and this is cyclic, and as someone have remarked above, this implies that $\frac{G}{\gamma_{3}(G)}$ is abelian and then $G'=\gamma_{2}(G)\subset \gamma_{3}(G)$ and finally $\gamma_{2}(G)= \gamma_{3}(G)$. Since $\gamma_{3}(G)=[\gamma_{2}(G),G]=[\gamma_{3}(G),G]=\gamma_{4}(G)$ and so on... But in last we know that $G$ is nilpotent and so there is a $c \in \mathbb{N}^{+}$ such that $\gamma_{c}(G)=1$ and so $G'=1$ that means $G$ is abelian.

For the general case one can see to the alternating group $A_{4}$: indeed one can prove that $|A_{4}|=12$, $|A'_{4}|=4$ so that the quotient $\frac{A_{4}}{A'_{4}}$ has 3 element and it is cyclic; but $A_{4}$ is not abelian.

$\endgroup$
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You could add in your answer a counterexample for the general case, so that one doesn't need to go back to the comments for it. Almost you might consider removing the first paragraph of your post: in 2-3 years, who will care that your answer was posted 3 years after the question was asked? $\endgroup$ – Najib Idrissi Aug 22 '16 at 15:53
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Najib Idrissi; I do it! thanks! $\endgroup$ – The Number Theorist Sep 15 '16 at 13:06
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Summarizing: generally, the argument shows that if $G$'s abelianization is cyclic, then the lower central series is stationary after the commutator. If it is nilpotent, this forces $G$ to be abelian (and therefore cyclic). $\endgroup$ – Ben Blum-Smith Sep 15 '16 at 13:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.